ReviewComputers in biology and medicine2022
COVID-19 diagnosis using state-of-the-art CNN architecture features and Bayesian Optimization.
Review in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- An uncertainty-aware vision transformer-BiLSTM Bayesian framework for reliable clinical decision support using chest X-rays.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Unlocking the Power of 3D Convolutional Neural Networks for COVID-19 Detection: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Review
- A Lightweight Breast Cancer Mass Classification Model Utilizing Simplified Swarm Optimization and Knowledge Distillation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predicting PD-L1 status in NSCLC patients using deep learning radiomics based on CT images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Overview of Wearable Healthcare Devices for Clinical Decision Support in the Prehospital Setting.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Texture-Based Classification to Overcome Uncertainty between COVID-19 and Viral Pneumonia Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Multimodal deep transfer learning to predict retinal vein occlusion macular edema recurrence after anti-VEGF therapy.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Deep learning in public health: Comparative predictive models for COVID-19 case forecasting.PloS one · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Infectious Disease Imaging.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2023Article
- TVFx - CoVID-19 X-Ray images classification approach using neural networks based feature thresholding technique.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- An augmented Snake Optimizer for diseases and COVID-19 diagnosis.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2023Article
- Automated COVID-19 detection with convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A comprehensive review of analyzing the chest X-ray images to detect COVID-19 infections using deep learning techniques.Soft computing · 2023Article
- Boosting automatic COVID-19 detection performance with self-supervised learning and batch knowledge ensembling.Computers in biology and medicine · 2023Article
- A COVID-19 medical image classification algorithm based on Transformer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Combating Covid-19 using machine learning and deep learning: Applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Array (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- A Novel Proposal for Deep Learning-Based Diabetes Prediction: Converting Clinical Data to Image Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Novel Light Convolutional Neural Network for COVID Detection with Watershed Based Region Growing Segmentation.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- Uncertain-CAM: Uncertainty-Based Ensemble Machine Voting for Improved COVID-19 CXR Classification and Explainability.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus outbreak 2019, called COVID-19, which originated in Wuhan, negatively affected the lives of millions of people and many people died from this infection. To prevent the spread of the disease, which is still in effect, various restriction decisions have been taken all over the world. In addition, the number of COVID-19 tests has been increased to quarantine infected people. However, due to the problems encountered in the supply of RT-PCR tests and the ease of obtaining Computed Tomography and X-ray images, imaging-based methods have become very popular in the diagnosis of COVID-19. Therefore, studies using these images to classify COVID-19 have increased. This paper presents a classification method for computed tomography chest images in the COVID-19 Radiography Database using features extracted by popular Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) models (AlexNet, ResNet18, ResNet50, Inceptionv3, Densenet201, Inceptionresnetv2, MobileNetv2, GoogleNet). The determination of hyperparameters of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms by Bayesian optimization, and ANN-based image segmentation are the two main contributions in this study. First of all, lung segmentation is performed automatically from the raw image with Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). To ensure data diversity, data augmentation is applied to the COVID-19 classes, which are fewer than the other two classes. Then these images are applied as input to five different CNN models. The features extracted from each CNN model are given as input to four different ML algorithms, namely Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), Naive Bayes (NB), and Decision Tree (DT) for classification. To achieve the most successful classification accuracy, the hyperparameters of each ML algorithm are determined using Bayesian optimization. With the classification made using these hyperparameters, the highest success is obtained as 96.29% with the DenseNet201 model and SVM algorithm. The Sensitivity, Precision, Specificity, MCC, and F1-Score metric values for this structure are 0.9642, 0.9642, 0.9812, 0.9641 and 0.9453, respectively. These results showed that ML methods with the most optimum hyperparameters can produce successful results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.