Observational studyJournal of the International AIDS Society2022
Uptake of community- versus clinic-based antiretroviral therapy dispensing in the Central Chronic Medication Dispensing and Distribution program in South Africa.
Observational study in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Barriers to ART adherence in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review toward achieving UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Monitoring patients on ART within the CCMDD programme and those attending an urban healthcare facility in KwaZulu-Natal.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024Article
- Does type of antiretroviral therapy pick-up point influence 12-month virologic suppression in South Africa?AIDS care · 2024Observational
- Uptake of community-based differentiated antiretroviral therapy service delivery and associated factors among people living with HIV in Ethiopia: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Long-term usage patterns and clinical outcomes in a community-based differentiated antiretroviral therapy delivery programme in South Africa.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2023Article
- Understanding Uganda's early adoption of novel differentiated HIV treatment services: a qualitative exploration of drivers of policy uptake.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- The Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Service Utilization Among Chronic Disease Patients in South Africa.Health services insights · 2023Article
- Experiences of participants in a decentralized antiretroviral therapy program in South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic.AIDS care · 2022Article
- Willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccination among people living with HIV in a high HIV prevalence community.BMC public health · 2022Observational
- Willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccination among people living with HIV in a high HIV prevalence community.Research square · 2022Article
- Retention on ART and viral suppression among patients in alternative models of differentiated HIV service delivery in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Utilization and Associated Factors of the Community-Based Differentiated Service Delivery Model Among ART Users in Dessie Public Health Facilities, Northeast Ethiopia: A Mixed Method Study.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSouth Africa's government-led Central Chronic Medication Dispensing and Distribution (CCMDD) program offers people living with HIV the option to collect antiretroviral therapy at their choice of community- or clinic-based pick-up points intended to increase convenience and decongest clinics. To understand CCMDD pick-up point use among people living with HIV, we evaluated factors associated with uptake of a community- versus clinic-based pick-up point at CCMDD enrolment.
methodsWe collected baseline data from October 2018 to March 2020 on adults (≥18 years) who met CCMDD clinical eligibility criteria (non-pregnant, on antiretroviral therapy for ≥1 year and virologically suppressed) as part of an observational cohort in seven public clinics in KwaZulu-Natal. We identified factors associated with community-based pick-up point uptake and fit a multivariable logistic regression model, including age, gender, employment status, self-perceived barriers to care, self-efficacy, HIV-related discrimination, and perceived benefits and challenges of CCMDD. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Among 1521 participants, 67% were females, with median age 36 years (IQR 30-44). Uptake of a community-based pick-up point was associated with younger age (aOR 1.18 per 10-year decrease, 95% CI 1.05-1.33), being employed ≥40 hours per week (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.10-1.83) versus being unemployed, no self-perceived barriers to care (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.09-1.86) and scoring between 36 and 39 (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.03-2.01) or 40 (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 1.39-2.63) versus 10-35 on the self-efficacy scale, where higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy. Additional factors included more convenient pick-up point location (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.77-3.04) or hours (aOR 5.09, 95% CI 3.71-6.98) as perceived benefits of CCMDD, and lack of in-clinic follow-up after a missed collection date as a perceived challenge of CCMDD (aOR 4.37, 95% CI 2.30-8.31).
conclusionsUptake of community-based pick-up was associated with younger age, full-time employment, and systemic and structural factors of living with HIV (no self-perceived barriers to care and high self-efficacy), as well as perceptions of CCMDD (convenient pick-up point location and hours, lack of in-clinic follow-up). Strategies to facilitate community-based pick-up point uptake should be tailored to patients' age, employment, self-perceived barriers to care and self-efficacy to maximize the impact of CCMDD in decongesting clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.