Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35077452›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Entomological outcomes of cluster-randomised, community-driven dengue vector-suppression interventions in Kampong Cham province, Cambodia.

Jacob Bigio, Leo Braack, Thy Chea, Srun Set, Sokha Suon, Pierre Echaubard, John Hustedt, Mark Debackere, Bernadette Ramirez, Didot Budi Prasetyo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. National dengue surveillance, Cambodia 2002-2020.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jacob BigioResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2929-4252
Leo BraackMalaria Consortium, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5286-5052
Thy CheaMalaria Consortium, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Srun SetMalaria Consortium, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sokha SuonMalaria Consortium, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Pierre EchaubardSOAS, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
John HustedtMalaria Consortium, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0002-4056-2994
Mark DebackereMalaria Consortium, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Bernadette RamirezSpecial Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Didot Budi PrasetyoConsultant Entomologist, AC Investment, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sam BunlengNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Ministry of Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Alexandra Wharton-SmithDepartment for Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5335-2059
Jeffrey HiiCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7097-7683

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cambodia has one of the highest dengue infection rates in Southeast Asia. Here we report quantitative entomological results of a large-scale cluster-randomised trial assessing the impact on vector populations of a package of vector control interventions including larvivorous guppy fish in household water containers, mosquito trapping with gravid-ovitraps, solid waste management, breeding-container coverage through community education and engagement for behavioural change, particularly through the participation of school children. These activities resulted in major reductions in Container Index, House Index, Breteau Index, Pupal Index and Adult Index (all p-values 0.002 or lower) in the Intervention Arm compared with the Control Arm in a series of household surveys conducted over a follow-up period of more than one year, although the project was not able to measure the longer-term sustainability of the interventions. Despite comparative reductions in Adult Index between the study arms, the Adult Index was higher in the Intervention Arm in the final household survey than in the first household survey. This package of biophysical and community engagement interventions was highly effective in reducing entomological indices for dengue compared with the control group, but caution is required in extrapolating the reduction in household Adult Index to a reduction in the overall population of adult Aedes mosquitoes, and in interpreting the relationship between a reduction in entomological indices and a reduction in the number of dengue cases. The package of interventions should be trialled in other locations.

Indexed as

AnimalsCambodiaCulicidaeDengueHousehold ArticlesLarvaMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsPoeciliaPublic HealthWaterWater SupplyWater

Identifiers

PMID35077452
PMCPMC8789142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.