Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35077343›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology (Reading, England)2022

A Tar aspartate receptor and Rubisco-like protein substitute biotin in the growth of rhizobial strains.

Carmen Vargas-Lagunas, Yolanda Mora, Alejandro Aguilar, Alma Ruth Reyes-González, Alejandra Arteaga-Ide, Michael F Dunn, Sergio Encarnación, Lourdes Girard, Humberto Peralta, Jaime Mora

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carmen Vargas-LagunasPrograma de Genómica Funcional de Procariotes, Laboratorio de Biología de Sistemas y Biología Sintética, Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Yolanda MoraPrograma de Genómica Funcional de Procariotes, Laboratorio de Biología de Sistemas y Biología Sintética, Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Alejandro AguilarPrograma de Genómica Funcional de Procariotes, Laboratorio de Biología de Sistemas y Biología Sintética, Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Alma Ruth Reyes-GonzálezPrograma de Genómica Funcional de Procariotes, Laboratorio de Biología de Sistemas y Biología Sintética, Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Alejandra Arteaga-IdePrograma de Genómica Funcional de Procariotes, Laboratorio de Biología de Sistemas y Biología Sintética, Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Michael F DunnPrograma de Genómica Funcional de Procariotes, Laboratorio de Biología de Sistemas y Biología Sintética, Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Sergio EncarnaciónPrograma de Genómica Funcional de Procariotes, Laboratorio de Biología de Sistemas y Biología Sintética, Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Lourdes GirardPrograma de Genómica Funcional de Procariotes, Laboratorio de Biología de Sistemas y Biología Sintética, Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Humberto PeraltaPrograma de Genómica Funcional de Procariotes, Laboratorio de Biología de Sistemas y Biología Sintética, Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Jaime MoraPrograma de Genómica Funcional de Procariotes, Laboratorio de Biología de Sistemas y Biología Sintética, Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biotin is a key cofactor of metabolic carboxylases, although many rhizobial strains are biotin auxotrophs. When some of these strains were serially subcultured in minimal medium, they showed diminished growth and increased excretion of metabolites. The addition of biotin, or genetic complementation with biotin synthesis genes resulted in full growth of

Indexed as

RhizobiumRhizobium etliBacterial ProteinsBiotinReceptors, Amino AcidRibulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylaseaspartic acid receptorBacterial ProteinsBiotinReceptors, Amino AcidRibulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylasechemotaxismetabolismmethyl-accepting proteinsnitrogen fixationrhizobiasubculturesvitamins

Identifiers

PMID35077343
PMCPMC8914248
OpenAlexW4207063996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.