ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022
Power, recovery and doing something worthwhile: A thematic analysis of expert patient perspectives in psychiatry education.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of involvement in mental health professional education on patient educators: a qualitative systematic review.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Public participation in healthcare students' education: An umbrella review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Pooled it
- Diversity in psychiatry education and patient and public involvement: roundtable analysis.BJPsych bulletin · 2026Review
- Integrating expert patients perspectives on the processes of engaging them in early medical education.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- 'ALL ABOUT MY IDEAL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE': Users, family members and experts by experience discussing a co-designed service.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Supporting patient decision-making in non-invasive prenatal testing: a comparative study of professional values and practices in England and France.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Laypeople's Perspective on Physician Work-Hour Restrictions in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of patient experience · 2024Article
- Barriers and facilitators faced by individuals with intellectual disabilities and/or autism when accessing primary healthcare.British journal of neuroscience nursing · 2022Article
- Translating and validating a Japanese version of the instrument for patient assessment of medical professionalism (J-IPAMP): a cross-sectional survey.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Power, recovery and doing something worthwhile: A thematic analysis of expert patient perspectives in psychiatry education.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient involvement in psychiatry education is required by policy and has many benefits for students. Little research has focused on the impact on expert patients (EPs).
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the impact of involvement in psychiatry education on mental health patients.
designA qualitative descriptive study using semistructured interviews was conducted in a psychiatry teaching unit in the East Midlands, UK. A purposive sample of 20 EPs involved in teaching was interviewed about the social and psychological impacts of involvement. Transcripts were analysed thematically and a coding scheme was developed.
resultsFive themes were identified: shaping the doctors of the future-something worthwhile, challenging assumptions about mental health, recovery and transformation, vulnerability and support and expertise and power.
conclusionThese EPs benefitted from their experience of teaching. Involvement in psychiatry teaching may require putting oneself in a vulnerable position, but a supportive and open faculty team may mitigate this challenge. The Expert Patient Programme was seen as a way of helping to reduce the power difference between patients and doctors in the future. There is a need to examine the language that we use to talk about patient involvement as this may have implications for this power dynamic. The context and mechanisms that lead to the benefits described by participants should be studied so that these benefits may be generalized to other contexts. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: An EP was involved in the planning and ethical approval application process of the project and the drafting and approval of this manuscript.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.