Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076869›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2022

Dose assessment for daily cone-beam CT in lung radiotherapy patients and its combination with treatment planning.

Hassan Albarakati, Price Jackson, Okan Gulal, Prabhakar Ramachandran, Glen Osbourne, Michael Liu, Tomas Kron, Moshi Geso

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hassan AlbarakatiDepartment of Physical Sciences, PeterMacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1729-5234
Price JacksonDepartment of Physical Sciences, PeterMacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Okan GulalDepartment of Physical Sciences, PeterMacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Prabhakar RamachandranDiscipline of Medical Radiations, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Glen OsbourneDepartment of Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michael LiuDepartment of Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Tomas KronDepartment of Physical Sciences, PeterMacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. tomas.kron@petermac.org.
Moshi GesoDiscipline of Medical Radiations, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. moshi.geso@rmit.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increased use of X-ray imaging for patient alignment in external beam radiation therapy, particularly with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), the additional dose received by patients has become of greater consideration. In this study, we analysed the radiation dose from CBCT for clinical lung radiotherapy and assessed its relative contribution when combined with radiation treatment planning for a variety of lung radiotherapy techniques. The Monte Carlo simulation program ImpactMC was used to calculate the 3D dose delivered by a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator to patients undergoing thorax CBCT imaging. The concomitant dose was calculated by simulating the daily CBCT irradiation of ten lung cancer patients. Each case was planned with a total dose of 50-60 Gy to the target lesion in 25-30 fractions using the 3DCRT or IMRT plan and retrospectively planned using VMAT. For each clinical case, the calculated CBCT dose was summed with the planned dose, and the dose to lungs, heart, and spinal cord were analysed according to conventional dose conformity metrics. Our results indicate greater variations in dose to the heart, lungs, and spinal cord based on planning technique, (3DCRT, IMRT, VMAT) than from the inclusion of daily cone-beam imaging doses over 25-30 fractions. The average doses from CBCT imaging per fraction to the lungs, heart and spinal cord were 0.52 ± 0.10, 0.49 ± 0.15 and 0.39 ± 0.08 cGy, respectively. Lung dose variations were related to the patient's size and body composition. Over a treatment course, this may result in an additional mean absorbed dose of 0.15-0.2 Gy. For lung V5, the imaging dose resulted in an average increase of ~ 0.6% of the total volume receiving 5 Gy. The increase in V20 was more dependent on the planning technique, with 3DCRT increasing by 0.11 ± 0.09% with imaging and IMRT and VMAT increasing by 0.17 ± 0.05% and 0.2 ± 0.06%, respectively. In this study, we assessed the concomitant dose for daily CBCT lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. The additional radiation dose to the normal lungs from daily CBCT was found to range from 0.15 to 0.2 Gy when the patient was treated with 25-30 fractions. Consideration of potential variation in relative biological effectiveness between kilovoltage imaging and megavoltage treatment dose was outside the scope of this study. Regardless of this, our results show that the assessment of imaging dose can be incorporated into the treatment planning process and the relative effect on overall dose distribution was small compared to the difference among planning techniques.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansLungRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesThorax3DCRTCBCT DoseDaily CBCTIMRTLung cancerMonte CarloVMAT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.