Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076861›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2022

Doctor-Patient Relationship in Synchronous/Real-time Video-Consultations and In-Person Visits: An Investigation of the Perceptions of Young People with Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Alda Troncone, Crescenzo Cascella, Antonietta Chianese, Angela Zanfardino, Francesca Casaburo, Alessia Piscopo, Francesco Maria Rosanio, Francesca di Candia, Adriana Franzese, Dario Iafusco and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alda TronconeDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Crescenzo CascellaDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Antonietta ChianeseDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Angela ZanfardinoDepartment of the Woman, of the Child and of the General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy. dottangelazanfardino@gmail.com.
Francesca CasaburoDepartment of the Woman, of the Child and of the General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Alessia PiscopoDepartment of the Woman, of the Child and of the General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Francesco Maria RosanioDepartment of Translational and Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, Regional Center of Pediatric Diabetes, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Francesca di CandiaDepartment of Translational and Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, Regional Center of Pediatric Diabetes, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Adriana FranzeseDepartment of Translational and Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, Regional Center of Pediatric Diabetes, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Dario IafuscoDepartment of the Woman, of the Child and of the General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Enza MozzilloDepartment of Translational and Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, Regional Center of Pediatric Diabetes, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Funding

Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli D.R. 906 del 4/10/2019, prot. n. 157264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven that the widely acknowledged influence of the doctor-patient relationship on objective health parameters and treatment adherence in chronic illnesses, this study sought to explore how patients perceived the patient-doctor relationship across virtual and in-person contexts.

methodsParents' and patients' perceptions of doctor-patient relationship were evaluated in 610 children and adolescents (12.17 ± 4.19 years, 50.9% girls) with type 1 diabetes who visited via video-conferencing or in person during the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsNo differences were found between video consultations and in-person visits in terms of care satisfaction (p > .05), doctor-patient relationship-for the dimensions agreement on tasks (p = .506) and bond (p = .828)-as perceived by parents and physician empathy as perceived by patients (p = .096). Parents rated patient-doctor agreement on explicit goals of treatment higher in video consultation than in person (p = .009, d = .211). Agreement on goals (β =  - .180, p = .016) and bond with doctor (β =  - .160, p = .034) were negatively and significantly associated with HbA1c values, but only in participants who visited in person.

conclusionsParents' care satisfaction and perceptions of doctor-patient relationship, along with patients' perceptions of physician empathy, did not substantially differ between visits carried out in person or via video consultations. Given the high risk of psychological problems described in young people with diabetes, video consultation can be considered a useful opportunity to maintain access to a healthcare provider in a challenging time, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdolescentChildFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMalePandemicsParentsPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsReferral and ConsultationGlycated HemoglobinCOVID-19Doctor-patient relationshipPhysician empathySatisfaction with careTeleconsultationType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35076861
PMCPMC8788397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.