Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076854›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2022

Genetic diversity among local mango (Mangifera indica L.) germplasm using morphological, biochemical and chloroplast DNA barcodes analyses.

Sanjay Kumar, Ram Avtar Kaushik, Devendra Jain, Ved Prakash Saini, S Ramesh Babu, Ravish Choudhary, Sezai Ercisli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sanjay KumarDepartment of Horticulture, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan, 313001, India.
Ram Avtar KaushikDepartment of Horticulture, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan, 313001, India.
Devendra JainDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan, 313001, India. devroshan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4345-1536
Ved Prakash SainiCollege of Fisheries, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan, 313001, India.
S Ramesh BabuDepartment of Entomology, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan, 313001, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9666-8683
Ravish ChoudharyDivision of Seed Science and Technology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0502-8649
Sezai ErcisliDepartment of Horticulture, Agricultural Faculty, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-5687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, the genetic diversity of local mango (Mangifera indica L.) germplasm including 14 genotypes were evaluated by using morphological, biochemical markers and DNA barcoding technique. Morphological characterization is the first step towards utilizing these germplasm in crop improvement studies. The advanced chloroplast based DNA barcode method can be utilized to assess the genetic diversity and phylogenetic structure in such populations.

methodsThe study was carried out during 2018-2019 years to evaluate local mango germplasm including 14 diverse genotypes based on a number of morphological and biochemical traits and chloroplast DNA barcoding as well. The experiment was laid out in one way ANOVA design with fourteen germplasm indicated with indigenous collection number.

resultsAmong local mango germplasm, IC 589756 was found to be the most promising with respect to high magnitudes of fruit length, fruit width, fruit weight, pulp weight, soluble solid content (SSC)/Acidity ratio, pH and low acidity followed by IC 589746 exhibiting the highest pulp percentage and SSC accompanied with lowest stone weight and stone percent as compared to the other genotypes. Further, the dendrogram and cluster analyses based on sequencing of chloroplast marker i.e., trnH- psbA and trnCD depicted the relationship among mango genotypes and clearly clustered them into two main clusters at a similarity coefficient 0.035 and 0.150, respectively. The first cluster includes only one genotype and cluster-II contains 13 genotypes.

conclusionsParticularly results revealed that DNA barcoding of local mango germplasm can assist not only in molecular identification but also help in elucidation of their phylogenetic relationship and thus important in maintaining biodiversity inventories.

Indexed as

MangiferaChloroplastsDNA, ChloroplastFruitGenetic VariationPhylogenyDNA, ChloroplastCharacterizationDiversityDNA barcodingMangifera indica L

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.