Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076796›Full record

ReviewSports medicine - open2022

Tracking Systems in Team Sports: A Narrative Review of Applications of the Data and Sport Specific Analysis.

Lorena Torres-Ronda, Emma Beanland, Sarah Whitehead, Alice Sweeting, Jo Clubb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine - open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Physical Demands during Official Competitions in Elite Handball: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lorena Torres-RondaInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia. lorenatorres07@yahoo.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4589-7961
Emma BeanlandSports Performance, Buffalo Bills, Buffalo, USA.
Sarah WhiteheadCarnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Alice SweetingInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jo ClubbSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6509-7531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seeking to obtain a competitive advantage and manage the risk of injury, team sport organisations are investing in tracking systems that can quantify training and competition characteristics. It is expected that such information can support objective decision-making for the prescription and manipulation of training load. This narrative review aims to summarise, and critically evaluate, different tracking systems and their use within team sports. The selection of systems should be dependent upon the context of the sport and needs careful consideration by practitioners. The selection of metrics requires a critical process to be able to describe, plan, monitor and evaluate training and competition characteristics of each sport. An emerging consideration for tracking systems data is the selection of suitable time analysis, such as temporal durations, peak demands or time series segmentation, whose best use depends on the temporal characteristics of the sport. Finally, examples of characteristics and the application of tracking data across seven popular team sports are presented. Practitioners working in specific team sports are advised to follow a critical thinking process, with a healthy dose of scepticism and awareness of appropriate theoretical frameworks, where possible, when creating new or selecting an existing metric to profile team sport athletes.

Indexed as

Global positionOptical trackingPerformanceRadio frequency systemsTechnology

Identifiers

PMID35076796
PMCPMC8789973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.