Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076786›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2022

Predictive Helmet Optimization Framework Based on Reduced-Order Modeling of the Brain Dynamics.

Alireza Mojahed, Javid Abderezaei, Efe Ozkaya, Lawrence Bergman, Alexander Vakakis, Mehmet Kurt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alireza Mojahed *Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. amojahed@mit.edu.
Javid Abderezaei *Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, 07030, USA.
Efe OzkayaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, 07030, USA.
Lawrence BergmanDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Alexander VakakisDepartment of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Mehmet KurtIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute Imaging Institute, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USStevens Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

National Science Foundation CMMI-17-1728186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sports-related traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are among the leading causes of head injuries in the world. Use of helmets is the main protective measure against this epidemic. The design criteria for the majority of the helmets often only consider the kinematics of the head. This approach neglects the importance of regional deformations of the brain especially near the deep white matter structures such as the corpus callosum (CC) which have been implicated in mTBI studies. In this work, we develop a dynamical reduced-order model of the skull-brain-helmet system to analyze the effect of various helmet parameters on the dynamics of the head and CC. Here, we show that the optimal head-helmet coupling values that minimize the CC dynamics are different from the ones that minimize the skull and brain dynamics (at some kinematics, up to two times stiffer for the head motion mitigation). By comparing our results with experimental impact tests performed on seven different helmets for five different sports, we found that the football helmets with an absorption of about 65-75% of the impact energy had the best performance in mitigating the head motion. Here, we found that none of the helmets are effective in protecting the CC from harmful impact energies. Our computational results reveal that the origin of the difference between the properties of a helmet mitigating the CC motion vs. the head motion is nonlinear vs. linear dynamics. Unlike the globally linear behavior of the head dynamics, we demonstrate that the CC exhibits nonlinear mechanical response similar to an energy sink. This means that there are scenarios where, at the instant of impact, the CC does not undergo extreme motions, but these may occur with a time delay as it absorbs shock energy from other parts of the brain. These findings hint at the importance of considering tissue level dynamics in designing new helmets.

Indexed as

Craniocerebral TraumaFootballAccelerationBrainHeadHead Protective DevicesHumansExperimental impact testsHelmet designmTBINonlinear corpus callosum modelReduced-order brain model

Identifiers

PMID35076786
OpenAlexW4210657153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.