ArticleParasitology research2022
Positivity, diagnosis and treatment follow-up of cutaneous leishmaniasis in war-affected areas of Bajaur, Pakistan.
Article in Parasitology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Karachi, Pakistan.JAAD international · 2025Article
- Epidemiology and future risk estimates of cutaneous leishmaniasis in district Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan: analysis of data from 2019-2022.African health sciences · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was conducted to explore the frequency of positivity of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in the tribal district Bajaur located near the Pak-Afghan border. The present study was conducted at the Leishmaniasis Center of Headquarter Hospital Khar District Bajaur, Pakistan. In total, 646 patients were recruited and included in the study after ethical approval and consent from the patients. CL was confirmed by taking blood samples from the sides of the lesion and observing them under a microscope using Giemsa staining. Information about demographic factors was collected from the study participants with a questionnaire and analyzed by SPSS. It was found that 73.8% of suspected patients were positive and 26.2% were negative for CL. There were 51.9% male and 48.1% female patients. The most frequently affected site was the face (42.6%), and most of the patients (85.8%) had only one lesion. The positivity of CL was higher among those under age 15 years. The area of most positivity, with 45.2% of the cases, was Tehsil Mamund. Most of the patients (46.6%) lived in stone houses, with 98.6% of patients having domestic animals in their houses. Approximately 198 patients were treated with intramuscular and intralesional injections of meglumine antimoniate, and their weekly follow-up revealed that 48% of patients recovered, while the remaining patients left the course of treatment at different stages of therapy. The positivity of CL is high in this area and is confirmed by the detection of Leishmania amastigotes in the blood collected from their lesions. Socioeconomic factors are the main underlying causes of the rapid spread of this disease and meglumine antimoniate is an effective drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.