Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076764›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2022

Clinical effects and safety of different transarterial chemoembolization methods for bridging and palliative treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Isabelle Mohr, Marie Vogeler, Jan Pfeiffenberger, Simon David Sprengel, Miriam Klauss, Boris Radeleff, Andreas Teufel, De-Hua Chang, Christoph Springfeld, Thomas Longerich and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Isabelle MohrInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marie Vogeler *Internal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan PfeiffenbergerInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Simon David SprengelDepartment of Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Miriam KlaussDepartment of Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Boris RadeleffDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Sana Klinikum Hof, Hof, Germany.
Andreas TeufelDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mannheim University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany.
De-Hua ChangDepartment of Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph SpringfeldDepartment of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas LongerichDepartment of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Uta MerleInternal Medicine IV, Department of Gastroenterology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Arianeb MehrabiDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karl Heinz WeissInternal Medicine, Salem Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus MiethDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Markus.mieth@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6331-9436
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg · DESana Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe assessed and compared clinical effects and safety endpoints of three methods of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), conventional (cTACE), with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE), and with degradable starch microspheres (DSM-TACE), used in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the bridging to liver transplant (LT) and the palliative setting.

methodsIn our center, 148 patients with HCC underwent 492 completed TACE procedures between 2008 and 2017 (158 for bridging to LT; 334 for palliative treatment) which we analyzed retrospectively. Of these procedures, 348 were DEB-TACE, 60 cTACE, and 84 DSM-TACE.

resultsThe cTACE procedure revealed a significantly longer period of hospitalization (p = 0.02), increased occurrence of nausea (p = 0.025), and rise in alanine transaminase (ALT) levels (p = 0.001), especially in the palliative setting. In the bridging to LT cohort, these clinical endpoints did not reach statistical significance.

conclusionsThe clinical safety of different TACE methods for HCC in both the palliative and the bridging to LT setting was equivalent. In the palliative setting, the cTACE procedure revealed an increased risk for adverse clinical effects such as nausea, elevation of ALT, and a prolonged period of hospitalization what might either be related to the systemic effects of the chemotherapeutic agent or to the differences in both collectives. Thus, further studies must be conducted on a larger number of TACE procedures to effectively explore the clinical side effects of the various TACE variants.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsAlanine TransaminaseHumansMicrospheresNauseaPalliative CareRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAlanine TransaminaseChemoembolizationHCCLiver cancerLiver transplantTACE

Identifiers

PMID35076764
PMCPMC9508038
OpenAlexW4220976582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.