ArticleJAMA network open2022
Trends in Prices of Drugs Used to Treat Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the US From 2015 to 2020.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Price trend, clinical benefit and within-class competition of drugs for metastatic Non-small cell lung cancer in China: a retrospective cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Synthesis, Antitumor Activity Evaluation and Mechanistic Study of Novel Bis-Heterocyclic Chalcones Against Liver Cancer.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
- Cell secretome as a potential anticancer therapeutic agent: composition, mechanisms, preclinical evidence, and translational challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- TDM-Based Tailored Dosing of Durvalumab in Lung Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2025Article
- Innovation Headroom for a Highly Accurate PD-L1 Companion Diagnostic in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Article
- An analysis of US net cancer drug launch prices and clinical efficacy and certainty of evidence from 2008 to 2022.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Review
- Inverted Pyramid Nanostructures Coupled with a Sandwich Immunoassay for SERS Biomarker Detection.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Global trends, decomposition analysis, inequality assessment, and economic projections of tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Association between oral targeted cancer drug net health benefit, uptake, and spending.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Green synthesized extracts/Au complex ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Targeting EphA2: a promising strategy to overcome chemoresistance and drug resistance in cancer.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Review
- Recent Trends in Nanocarrier-Based Drug Delivery System for Prostate Cancer.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2024Review
- Launch and Post-Launch Prices of Injectable Cancer Drugs in the US: Clinical Benefit, Innovation, Epidemiology, and Competition.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- Navigating approval pathways for immunotherapy in NSCLC: should criteria be revised?Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Challenges in the Use of Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer research and treatment · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Oncology drug prices are a determinant of health disparities in the US and worldwide. Several new therapeutic agents for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have become available on the US market over the past decade. Although increased competition typically produces lower prices, competition among brand-name oncology drugs has not resulted in lower prices. Objective: To assess price changes in class-specific brand-name medications used to treat metastatic NSCLC in the US from 2015 to 2020. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study, conducted from August 13, 2015, to August 13, 2020, used data from the Micromedex Red Book and Medi-Span Price Rx databases. The study sample was limited to 17 brand-name medications used to treat metastatic NSCLC that were available for purchase before January 1, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were trends over time in average wholesale prices and wholesale acquisition cost unit prices and the correlation in price among the multiple brand-name medications within each therapeutic class (immune checkpoint inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors, ROS1 inhibitors, BRAF inhibitors, and MEK inhibitors), measured using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The compounded annual growth rates of different medication costs were compared with the annual inflation rate and the consumer price index for prescription drugs. Results: For all drug classes, the Pearson correlation coefficient approached 1.0, indicating an increase in drug list prices despite within-class drug competition. The median Pearson correlation coefficient values were 0.964 (range, 0.951-0.994) for immune checkpoint inhibitors, 0.898 (range, 0.665-0.950) for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, 0.999 (range, 0.982-0.999) for anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors, and 0.999 for BRAF and MEK inhibitors. The median compounded annual growth rates for most drug costs were higher than the annual inflation rate and consumer price index for prescription drugs: 1.81% (range, 1.29%-2.13%) for immune checkpoint inhibitors, 2.56% (range, 2.38%-5.26%) for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, 2.46% (range, 1.75%-4.66%) for anaplastic lymphoma kinase and ROS1 inhibitors, and 3.06% (range, 0%-3.06%) for BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, prices of brand-name medications for treatment of NSCLC increased in the US from 2015 to 2020 without evidence of price competition, raising concern about the affordability of promising oncology drugs. These findings suggest that drug pricing reform is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.