Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076695›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2022

Adherence to the American Diabetes Association's Glycemic Goals in the Treatment of Diabetes Among Older Americans, 2001-2018.

Phuc Le, Gina Ayers, Anita D Misra-Hebert, Shoshana J Herzig, William H Herman, Victoria A Shaker, Michael B Rothberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Crossing the deintensification chasm for older adults with diabetes.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Phuc LeCenter for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0003-4788-773X
Gina AyersDepartment of Pharmacy and Center for Geriatric Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Anita D Misra-HebertCenter for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0003-3079-7025
Shoshana J HerzigDivision of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
William H HermanUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-0502-674X
Victoria A ShakerCenter for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Michael B RothbergCenter for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Cleveland Clinic · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Impact of a Team-based Approach to Primary Care: A Natural Experiment in Primary Care RedesignK08HS024128 · AHRQ · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · PI MISRA-HEBERT, ANITA DIANA · 2016 to 2020
$738k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS024128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess trends in HbA1c and appropriateness of diabetes medication use by patient health status. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted cross-sectional analysis of 2001-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We included older adults age ≥65 years who had ever been told they had diabetes, had HbA1c >6.4%, or had fasting plasma glucose >125 mg/dL. Health status was categorized as good, intermediate, or poor. Being below goal was defined as taking medication despite having HbA1c ≥1% below the glycemic goals of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), which varied by patient health status and time period. Drugs associated with hypoglycemia included sulfonylureas, insulin, and meglitinides.

resultsWe included 3,539 patients. Mean HbA1c increased over time and did not differ by health status. Medication use increased from 59% to 74% with metformin being the most common drug in patients with good or intermediate health and sulfonylureas and insulin most often prescribed to patients with poor health. Among patients taking medications, prevalence of patients below goal increased while prevalence of those above goal decreased from 2001 to 2018. One-half of patients with poor health and taking medications had below-goal HbA1c; two-thirds received drugs associated with hypoglycemia. Patients with poor health who were below goal had 4.9 (95% CI 2.3-10.4) times the adjusted odds of receiving drugs associated with hypoglycemia than healthy patients.

conclusionsIn accordance with ADA's newer Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, HbA1c goals were relaxed but did not differ by health status. Below-goal HbA1c was common among patients with poor health; many were prescribed medications associated with a higher risk of hypoglycemia.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HypoglycemiaAgedBlood GlucoseCross-Sectional StudiesGlycated HemoglobinGoalsHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinNutrition SurveysSulfonylurea CompoundsUnited StatesBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinSulfonylurea Compounds

Identifiers

PMID35076695
OpenAlexW4206918068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.