Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076635›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Attentional Orienting in Front and Rear Spaces in a Virtual Reality Discrimination Task.

Rébaï Soret, Pom Charras, Christophe Hurter, Vsevolod Peysakhovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rébaï SoretISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, 31400 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4670-5199
Pom CharrasPsychology Department, Université Paul-Valéry-Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Christophe HurterÉcole Nationale de l'Aviation Civile, 31400 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4318-6717
Vsevolod PeysakhovichISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse, 31400 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9791-4460

Funding

ANR ASTRID ANR-18-ASTR-0026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies on covert attention suggested that the visual processing of information in front of us is different, depending on whether the information is present in front of us or if it is a reflection of information behind us (mirror information). This difference in processing suggests that we have different processes for directing our attention to objects in front of us (front space) or behind us (rear space). In this study, we investigated the effects of attentional orienting in front and rear space consecutive of visual or auditory endogenous cues. Twenty-one participants performed a modified version of the Posner paradigm in virtual reality during a spaceship discrimination task. An eye tracker integrated into the virtual reality headset was used to make sure that the participants did not move their eyes and used their covert attention. The results show that informative cues produced faster response times than non-informative cues but no impact on target identification was observed. In addition, we observed faster response times when the target occurred in front space rather than in rear space. These results are consistent with an orienting cognitive process differentiation in the front and rear spaces. Several explanations are discussed. No effect was found on subjects' eye movements, suggesting that participants did not use their overt attention to improve task performance.

Indexed as

attentional orientingdiscrimination taskeye trackingfront spacePosner paradigmrear spacespatial cognitionvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35076635
PMCPMC8788563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.