Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076594›Full record

ReviewPediatric reports2022

Utility of Three-Dimensional Printing for Preoperative Assessment of Children with Extra-Cranial Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review.

Sachit Anand, Nellai Krishnan, Prabudh Goel, Anjan Kumar Dhua, Vishesh Jain, Devendra Kumar Yadav, Minu Bajpai

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sachit AnandDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Mumbai 400053, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0447-2350
Nellai KrishnanDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Prabudh GoelDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6179-1625
Anjan Kumar DhuaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Vishesh JainDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Devendra Kumar YadavDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Minu BajpaiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INKokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn cases with solid tumors, preoperative radiological investigations provide valuable information on the anatomy of the tumor and the adjoining structures, thus helping in operative planning. However, due to a two-dimensional view in these investigations, a detailed spatial relationship is difficult to decipher. In contrast, three-dimensional (3D) printing technology provides a precise topographic view to perform safe surgical resections of these tumors. This systematic review aimed to summarize and analyze current evidence on the utility of 3D printing in pediatric extra-cranial solid tumors.

methodsThe present study was registered on PROSPERO-international prospective register of systematic reviews (registration number: CRD42020206022). PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases were explored with appropriate search criteria to select the relevant studies. Data were extracted to study the bibliographic information of each article, the number of patients in each study, age of the patient(s), type of tumor, organ of involvement, application of 3D printing (surgical planning, training, and/or parental education). The details of 3D printing, such as type of imaging used, software details, printing technique, printing material, and cost were also synthesized.

resultsEight studies were finally included in the systematic review. Three-dimensional printing technology was used in thirty children with Wilms tumor (n = 13), neuroblastoma (n = 7), hepatic tumors (n = 8), retroperitoneal tumor (n = 1), and synovial sarcoma (n = 1). Among the included studies, the technology was utilized for preoperative surgical planning (five studies), improved understanding of the surgical anatomy of solid organs (two studies), and improving the parental understanding of the tumor and its management (one study). Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were either performed alone or in combination for radiological evaluation in these children. Different types of printers and printing materials were used in the included studies. The cost of the 3D printed models and time involved (range 10 h to 4-5 days) were reported by two studies each.

conclusions3D printed models can be of great assistance to pediatric surgeons in understanding the spatial relationships of tumors with the adjacent anatomic structures. They also facilitate the understanding of families, improving doctor-patient communication.

Indexed as

childrenextra-cranialpediatric oncologypreoperative planningsolid tumorsthree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID35076594
PMCPMC8788437
OpenAlexW4205639784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.