Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076463›Full record

ReviewAudiology research2022

Usher Syndrome.

Alessandro Castiglione, Claes Möller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Audiology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identification of a recessiveVeterinary and animal science · 2026
    Article
  8. Two Novel Compound HeterozygousInternational journal of general medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. AFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Expert consensus on prognostic evaluation of cochlear implantation in hereditary hearing loss].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  14. [Genetic and clinical phenotypic analysis of Usher syndrome-associated gene variants].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Identification of NovelHuman mutation · 2025
    Article
  20. Loss of Usher II Proteins in Mice Does Not Affect Photoreceptor Ultrastructure.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandro CastiglioneAudiology Department, Örebro University Hospital, 70210 Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5776-0444
Claes MöllerAudiology Department, Örebro University Hospital, 70210 Örebro, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Usher syndrome (USH) is the most common genetic condition responsible for combined loss of hearing and vision. Balance disorders and bilateral vestibular areflexia are also observed in some cases. The syndrome was first described by Albrecht von Graefe in 1858, but later named by Charles Usher, who presented a large number of cases with hearing loss and retinopathy in 1914. USH has been grouped into three main clinical types: 1, 2, and 3, which are caused by mutations in different genes and are further divided into different subtypes. To date, nine causative genes have been identified and confirmed as responsible for the syndrome when mutated:

Indexed as

ciliopathiesgenetic hearing lossUsher syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35076463
PMCPMC8788290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.