Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076407›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Development of a Pipeline for Adverse Drug Reaction Identification in Clinical Notes: Word Embedding Models and String Matching.

Klaske R Siegersma, Maxime Evers, Sophie H Bots, Floor Groepenhoff, Yolande Appelman, Leonard Hofstra, Igor I Tulevski, G Aernout Somsen, Hester M den Ruijter, Marco Spruit and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Klaske R SiegersmaLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6377-6867
Maxime EversLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8988-3190
Sophie H BotsLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4483-5582
Floor GroepenhoffLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1583-701X
Yolande AppelmanDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5241-7105
Leonard HofstraDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4432-4720
Igor I TulevskiCardiology Centers of the Netherlands, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8507-1531
G Aernout SomsenCardiology Centers of the Netherlands, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5690-4429
Hester M den RuijterLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9762-014X
Marco Spruit *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9237-221X
N Charlotte Onland-Moret *Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2360-913X
Utrecht University · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge about adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the population is limited because of underreporting, which hampers surveillance and assessment of drug safety. Therefore, gathering accurate information that can be retrieved from clinical notes about the incidence of ADRs is of great relevance. However, manual labeling of these notes is time-consuming, and automatization can improve the use of free-text clinical notes for the identification of ADRs. Furthermore, tools for language processing in languages other than English are not widely available.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to design and evaluate a method for automatic extraction of medication and Adverse Drug Reaction Identification in Clinical Notes (ADRIN).

methodsDutch free-text clinical notes (N=277,398) and medication registrations (N=499,435) from the Cardiology Centers of the Netherlands database were used. All clinical notes were used to develop word embedding models. Vector representations of word embedding models and string matching with a medical dictionary (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA]) were used for identification of ADRs and medication in a test set of clinical notes that were manually labeled. Several settings, including search area and punctuation, could be adjusted in the prototype to evaluate the optimal version of the prototype.

resultsThe ADRIN method was evaluated using a test set of 988 clinical notes written on the stop date of a drug. Multiple versions of the prototype were evaluated for a variety of tasks. Binary classification of ADR presence achieved the highest accuracy of 0.84. Reduced search area and inclusion of punctuation improved performance, whereas incorporation of the MedDRA did not improve the performance of the pipeline.

conclusionsThe ADRIN method and prototype are effective in recognizing ADRs in Dutch clinical notes from cardiac diagnostic screening centers. Surprisingly, incorporation of the MedDRA did not result in improved identification on top of word embedding models. The implementation of the ADRIN tool may help increase the identification of ADRs, resulting in better care and saving substantial health care costs.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionsclinical notesword embeddings

Identifiers

PMID35076407
PMCPMC8826143
OpenAlexW4207070465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.