Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076404›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

Using Large-scale Social Media Analytics to Understand Patient Perspectives About Urinary Tract Infections: Thematic Analysis.

Gabriela Gonzalez, Kristina Vaculik, Carine Khalil, Yuliya Zektser, Corey Arnold, Christopher V Almario, Brennan Spiegel, Jennifer Anger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measurement in Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Endometriosis Communities on Reddit: Quantitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabriela GonzalezDepartment of Urology, Davis School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2405-4137
Kristina VaculikCedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6666-477X
Carine KhalilCedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5071-0500
Yuliya ZektserDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0800-4631
Corey ArnoldComputational Diagnostics, Departments of Radiology and Pathology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4119-8143
Christopher V AlmarioCedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0664-9479
Brennan SpiegelCedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4608-6896
Jennifer AngerDepartment of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3897-5941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent qualitative literature about the experiences of women dealing with urinary tract infections (UTIs) is limited to patients recruited from tertiary centers and medical clinics. However, traditional focus groups and interviews may limit what patients share. Using digital ethnography, we analyzed free-range conversations of an online community.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate and characterize the patient perspectives of women dealing with UTIs using digital ethnography.

methodsA data-mining service was used to identify online posts. A thematic analysis was conducted on a subset of the identified posts. Additionally, a latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) probabilistic topic modeling method was applied to review the entire data set using a semiautomatic approach. Each identified topic was generated as a discrete distribution over the words in the collection, which can be thought of as a word cloud. We also performed a thematic analysis of the word cloud topic model results.

resultsA total of 83,589 posts by 53,460 users from 859 websites were identified. Our hand-coding inductive analysis yielded the following 7 themes: quality-of-life impact, knowledge acquisition, support of the online community, health care utilization, risk factors and prevention, antibiotic treatment, and alternative therapies. Using the LDA topic model method, 105 themes were identified and consolidated into 9 categories. Of the LDA-derived themes, 25.7% (27/105) were related to online community support, and 22% (23/105) focused on UTI risk factors and prevention strategies.

conclusionsOur large-scale social media analysis supports the importance and reproducibility of using online data to comprehend women's UTI experience. This inductive thematic analysis highlights patient behavior, self-empowerment, and online media utilization by women to address their health concerns in a safe, anonymous way.

Indexed as

Social MediaUrinary Tract InfectionsCommunity SupportFemaleHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareReproducibility of Resultsdata miningdigital ethnographyfemale urologyhealth services researchlatent Dirichlet allocationonline communityonline forumsocial mediaurinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID35076404
PMCPMC8826307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.