Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076361›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2023

Use of multiple polygenic risk scores for distinguishing schizophrenia-spectrum disorder and affective psychosis categories in a first-episode sample; the EU-GEI study.

Victoria Rodriguez, Luis Alameda, Diego Quattrone, Giada Tripoli, Charlotte Gayer-Anderson, Edoardo Spinazzola, Giulia Trotta, Hannah E Jongsma, Simona Stilo, Caterina La Cascia and 26 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. An etiological approach to psychosis: potential benefits for treatment, research and prevention.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Polygenic risk scores in clinical applications - opportunities and challenges.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 16 institutions in 8 countries.

Victoria RodriguezPsychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0383-0846
Luis AlamedaPsychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College of London, London, UK.
Diego QuattroneSocial, Genetics and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Giada TripoliPsychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College of London, London, UK.
Charlotte Gayer-AndersonDepartment of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Edoardo SpinazzolaPsychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College of London, London, UK.
Giulia TrottaPsychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College of London, London, UK.
Hannah E JongsmaPsylife Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Simona StiloDepartment of Mental Health and Addiction Services, ASP Crotone, Crotone, Italy.
Caterina La CasciaSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and advanced Diagnostic (BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Laura FerraroSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and advanced Diagnostic (BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Daniele La BarberaSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and advanced Diagnostic (BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Antonio LasalviaSection of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Sarah TosatoSection of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Ilaria TarriconeBologna Transcultural Psychosomatic Team (BoTPT), Department of Medical and Surgical Science, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Elena BonoraBologna Transcultural Psychosomatic Team (BoTPT), Department of Medical and Surgical Science, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Stéphane JamainNeuropsychiatrie Translationnelle, INSERM, U955, Faculté de Santé, Université Paris Est, Créteil, France.
Jean-Paul SeltenRivierduinen Institute for Mental Health Care, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eva VelthorstDepartment of Psychiatry, Early Psychosis Section, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lieuwe de HaanDepartment of Psychiatry, Early Psychosis Section, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pierre-Michel LlorcaUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Manuel ArrojoDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Genetic Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago, Spain.
Julio BobesInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Spain.
Miguel BernardoBarcelona Clinic Schizophrenia Unit, Neuroscience Institute, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain.
Celso ArangoDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, IiSGM, CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain.
James KirkbridePsylife Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Peter B JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Bart P RuttenDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alexander RichardsDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Pak C ShamSocial, Genetics and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Michael O'DonovanDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Jim Van OsPsychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College of London, London, UK.
Craig MorganDepartment of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Marta Di FortiSocial, Genetics and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Robin M MurrayPsychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College of London, London, UK.
Evangelos VassosSocial, Genetics and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBUniversity of Palermo · ITAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCardiff University · GBMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Verona · ITCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESInserm · FRIstituto S.Anna Crotone · ITUniversidad de Oviedo · ESUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FRUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L010305/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchizophrenia (SZ), bipolar disorder (BD) and depression (D) run in families. This susceptibility is partly due to hundreds or thousands of common genetic variants, each conferring a fractional risk. The cumulative effects of the associated variants can be summarised as a polygenic risk score (PRS). Using data from the EUropean Network of national schizophrenia networks studying Gene-Environment Interactions (EU-GEI) first episode case-control study, we aimed to test whether PRSs for three major psychiatric disorders (SZ, BD, D) and for intelligent quotient (IQ) as a neurodevelopmental proxy, can discriminate affective psychosis (AP) from schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (SSD).

methodsParticipants (842 cases, 1284 controls) from 16 European EU-GEI sites were successfully genotyped following standard quality control procedures. The sample was stratified based on genomic ancestry and analyses were done only on the subsample representing the European population (573 cases, 1005 controls). Using PRS for SZ, BD, D, and IQ built from the latest available summary statistics, we performed simple or multinomial logistic regression models adjusted for 10 principal components for the different clinical comparisons.

resultsIn case-control comparisons PRS-SZ, PRS-BD and PRS-D distributed differentially across psychotic subcategories. In case-case comparisons, both PRS-SZ [odds ratio (OR) = 0.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.92] and PRS-D (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.06-1.61) differentiated AP from SSD; and within AP categories, only PRS-SZ differentiated BD from psychotic depression (OR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.23-3.74).

conclusionsCombining PRS for severe psychiatric disorders in prediction models for psychosis phenotypes can increase discriminative ability and improve our understanding of these phenotypes. Our results point towards the potential usefulness of PRSs in specific populations such as high-risk or early psychosis phases.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersSchizophreniaCase-Control StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMultifactorial InheritanceRisk FactorsAffective psychosisbipolar disorderdiagnosisgeneticspolygenic scorepsychosispsychotic depressionschizophrenia-spectrum disorder

Identifiers

PMID35076361
PMCPMC10277719
OpenAlexW4210720798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.