Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076357›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2022

Quality of care and respect of human rights in mental health services in four West African countries: collaboration between the mental health leadership and advocacy programme and the World Health Organization QualityRights initiative.

Maria Francesca Moro, Lola Kola, Olawoye Fadahunsi, Edward Munda Jah, Humphrey Kofie, Dawda Samba, Sametta Thomas, Natalie Drew, Emeka Nwefoh, Soumitra Pathare and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The World Psychiatric Association calls for action on supporting alternatives to coercion in mental health care.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maria Francesca MoroDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4426-8044
Lola KolaWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health, Neurosciences and Substance Abuse, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Olawoye FadahunsiWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health, Neurosciences and Substance Abuse, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Edward Munda JahMental Health Coalition, Sierra Leone.
Humphrey KofieMental Health Society of Ghana, Ghana.
Dawda SambaUN World Food Programme, The Gambia.
Sametta ThomasLiberia Coalition of Mental Health Services, Liberia.
Natalie DrewPolicy, Law and Human Rights, Department of Mental Health & Substance Use, World Health Organization, Switzerland.
Emeka NwefohCBM Country Office, Nigeria.
Soumitra PathareCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9311-9024
Julian EatonCBM Global Disability and Inclusion and Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-4965
Michelle FunkPolicy, Law and Human Rights, Department of Mental Health & Substance Use, World Health Organization, Switzerland.
Oye GurejeWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health, Neurosciences and Substance Abuse, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Funding

CBM with support of the Australian Government through the Australian NGO Cooperation Program (ANCP). Fondation d'HarcourtWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough recent reports suggest that service users in West African psychiatric facilities are exposed to poor quality of care and human rights violations, evidence is lacking on the extent and profile of specific deficits in the services provided to persons with mental health conditions.

aimsTo evaluate the quality of care and respect of human rights in psychiatric facilities in four West African countries, The Gambia, Ghana, Liberia and Sierra Leone, using the World Health Organization QualityRights Toolkit.

methodTrained research workers collected information through observation, review of records and interviews with service users, caregivers and staff. Independent panels of assessors used the information to assign scores to the criteria, standards and themes of the QualityRights Toolkit.

resultsThe study revealed significant gaps in these facilities. The rights to an adequate standard of living and to enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health were poorly promoted. Adherence to the right to exercise legal capacity and the right to personal liberty and security was almost absent. Severe shortcomings in the promotion of the right to live independently and be included in the community were reported.

conclusionsInadequate appreciation of service users' rights, lack of basic approaches to protect them and the non-promotion of rights-based services in these facilities are major problems that need to be addressed. Although it recognises the resource constraints and need for more human and financial resources, the study also identifies critical areas and challenges that require significant changes at the facility level.

Indexed as

human rightspsychiatric servicesUnited Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with DisabilitiesWest AfricaWorld Health Organization QualityRights

Identifiers

PMID35076357
PMCPMC8811781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.