Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076339›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical biology2022

Protective effects of

Da Sol Kim, Ting Zhang, Sunmin Park

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Da Sol KimFood & Nutrition, Obesity/Diabetes Center, Hoseo University, Asan, South Korea.
Ting ZhangFood & Nutrition, Obesity/Diabetes Center, Hoseo University, Asan, South Korea.
Sunmin ParkFood & Nutrition, Obesity/Diabetes Center, Hoseo University, Asan, South Korea.
Hoseo University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextFruits of

objectiveWe examined the alleviation of memory function in Alzheimer's disease (AD) rats fed MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty Sprague-Dawley male rats had hippocampal infusions of amyloid-β

resultsMemory impairment was prevented in the AD-FF (0.54 ± 0.06-fold) and the AD-CS rats (0.33 ± 0.04-fold) compared to the AD-CON by inhibiting amyloid-β deposition to the levels less than one-fourth of the AD-CON group. The hippocampal pAkt→pGSK-3β→pFOXO1 pathway was attenuated by approximately 3.25-fold in the AD-CON, while AD-FF prevented the attenuation better than AD-CS. The relative intensity of hippocampal tau protein based on β-actin was suppressed with AD-FF (0.68 ± 0.09) and AD-CS (0.96 ± 0.81), compared to AD-CON (1.19 ± 0.13). AD decreased the abundance of DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsFF improved memory deficits better than CS in an AD-induced rat model. The potential neuroprotective benefits of FF against AD may be applicable to human AD therapy with additional clinical research.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsCassiaDisease Models, AnimalForsythiaFruitGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMaleMemory DisordersNeuroprotective AgentsPlant ExtractsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySeedsAmyloid beta-PeptidesNeuroprotective AgentsPlant ExtractsAmyloid-βgut-brain axishippocampal insulin signallingmemory functionneuroinflammation

Identifiers

PMID35076339
PMCPMC8794073
OpenAlexW4206909487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.