ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2022
Craniofacial growth and morphology among intersecting clinical categories.
Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- CBCT Evaluation of the Mandibular Foramen According to Age, Sex, and Sagittal Skeletal Class in Growing Individuals.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of Volumetric Alterations of the Tongue Base on Craniofacial Growth in the Adult Minipig.Journal of morphology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Vertical and Sagittal Cephalometric Parameters in Differentiating Skeletal Malocclusion in Saudi Adults: A Cephalometric Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessment of mandibular ramus dimensions in relation to lower third molar impaction in class II malocclusion: a comparative 2D and 3D CBCT evaluation.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of Malocclusion on Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Transverse skeletal proportionality in the prognostic evaluation of facemask therapy for skeletal class III malocclusion: a retrospective cephalometric study.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
- Analysis of predictive factors for post-orthodontic stability: a retrospective cohort study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- 3D Correspondence Between Maxillary Central Incisor Morphology and Facial Shape in Young Adults.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- A Modified Expandable Headgear-Activator for Combined Adenotonsillar Hypertrophy and Bimaxillary Constriction: Insights from a 9-Year Follow-Up.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2026Article
- Pharyngeal Airway Changes After Functional Orthodontic Treatment in Growing Class II Patients: A Retrospective Cephalometric Comparison of Twin Block, RPE and AMCOPLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry and its association to occlusal and muscular imbalance in young women.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- Assessing the impact of occlusal plane rotation on facial aesthetics in orthodontic treatment: a machine learning approach.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Cross-sectional data accurately model longitudinal growth in the craniofacial skeleton.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Differential patterns of craniofacial growth are important sources of variation that can result in skeletal malocclusion. Understanding the timing of growth milestones and morphological change associated with adult skeletal malocclusions is critical for developing individualized orthodontic growth modification strategies. To identify patterns in the timing and geometry of growth, we used Bayesian modeling of cephalometrics and geometric morphometric analyses with a dense, longitudinal sample consisting of 15,407 cephalograms from 1,913 individuals between 2 and 31 years of age. Individuals were classified into vertical facial types (hyper-, normo-, hypo-divergent) and anteroposterior (A-P) skeletal classes (Class I, Class II, Class III) based on adult mandibular plane angle and ANB angle, respectively. These classifications yielded eight facial type-skeletal class categories with sufficient sample sizes to be included in the study. Four linear cephalometrics representing facial heights and maxillary and mandibular lengths were fit to standard double logistic models generating type-class category-specific estimates for age, size, and rate of growth at growth milestones. Mean landmark configurations were compared among type-class categories at four time points between 6 and 20 years of age. Overall, morphology and growth patterns were more similar within vertical facial types than within A-P classes and variation among A-P classes typically nested within variation among vertical types. Further, type-class-associated variation in the rate and magnitude of growth in specific regions identified here may serve as targets for clinical treatment of complex vertical and A-P skeletal malocclusion and provide a clearer picture of the development of variation in craniofacial form.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.