Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35076065›Full record

SynthesisNutrition reviews2022

An equity-oriented systematic review of online grocery shopping among low-income populations: implications for policy and research.

Angela C B Trude, Caitlin M Lowery, Shahmir H Ali, Gabriela M Vedovato

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrition reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Diet Quality of Older African Americans: Impact of Knowledge and Perceived Threat of COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angela C B TrudeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2881-1089
Caitlin M LoweryDepartment of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Shahmir H AliDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, New York, USA.
Gabriela M VedovatoInstitute of Health and Society, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Santos, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextOnline grocery services are an emerging component of the food system with the potential to address disparities in access to healthy food.

objectiveWe assessed the barriers and facilitators of equitable access to healthy foods in the online grocery environment, and the psychosocial, purchasing, and dietary behaviors related to its use among low-income, diverse populations. DATA SOURCES: Four electronic databases were searched to identify relevant literature; 16 studies were identified.

resultsBarriers to equitable access to healthy food included cost and limited availability of online grocery services in food deserts and rural areas. The expansion of online grocery services and the ability to use nutrition assistance benefits online were equity-promoting factors. Perceived low control over food selection was a psychosocial factor that discouraged online grocery use, whereas convenience and lower perceived stress were facilitators. Findings were mixed regarding healthfulness of foods purchased online. Although few studies assessed diet, healthy food consumption was associated with online grocery use.

conclusionResearchers should assess the impact of online grocery shopping on low-income families' food purchases and diet. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD: 42021240277.

Indexed as

Food PreferencesPovertyConsumer BehaviorDietFood SupplyHumansPolicydietequityfood purchaselow incomeonline grocerypolicySupplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Identifiers

PMID35076065
PMCPMC8990744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.