ArticlemAbs
Machine learning prediction of antibody aggregation and viscosity for high concentration formulation development of protein therapeutics.
Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Review
- Article
- Predicting non-specific binding of VHHs using machine learning models with cluster-aware validation.mAbs · 2026Article
- Beyond affinity: AI-supported developability assessment and multi-objective optimization in antibody development.Antibody therapeutics · 2026Review
- A Review on Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Monoclonal Antibody (mAb) Manufacturing.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Closing the Translational Gap: Closed-Loop AI Discovery Frameworks for Experimental Validation and Clinical Implementation in Cancer Therapeutics.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Predicting Agitation Stability of Monoclonal Antibodies during Developability Assessment.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Fab-Fc and Fab-Fab interactions of variable strength and valency contribute to the high concentration viscosity of IgGProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Formulation Matters: The Overlooked Engine of Stability and Success in Antibody-Drug Conjugates.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Characterization of Conformational Instability of Monoclonal Antibodies During Chromatographic Purification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advances in Therapeutic Antibody Discovery and Development Targeting G Protein-Coupled Receptors.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Review
- Emerging Technologies and Integrated Interdisciplinary Strategies for Mitigating Protein Aggregation in Therapeutic Formulations.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Review
- PROPERMAB: an integrative framework formAbs · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Electrostatics and viscosity are strongly linked in concentrated antibody solutions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning has been recently used to predict therapeutic antibody aggregation rates and viscosity at high concentrations (150 mg/ml). These works focused on commercially available antibodies, which may have been optimized for stability. In this study, we measured accelerated aggregation rates at 45°C and viscosity at 150 mg/ml for 20 preclinical and clinical-stage antibodies. Features obtained from molecular dynamics simulations of the full-length antibody and sequences were used for machine learning model construction. We found a k-nearest neighbors regression model with two features, spatial positive charge map on the CDRH2 and solvent-accessible surface area of hydrophobic residues on the variable fragment, gives the best performance for predicting antibody aggregation rates (r = 0.89). For the viscosity classification model, the model with the highest accuracy is a logistic regression model with two features, spatial negative charge map on the heavy chain variable region and spatial negative charge map on the light chain variable region. The accuracy and the area under precision recall curve of the classification model from validation tests are 0.86 and 0.70, respectively. In addition, we combined data from another 27 commercial mAbs to develop a viscosity predictive model. The best model is a logistic regression model with two features, number of hydrophobic residues on the light chain variable region and net charges on the light chain variable region. The accuracy and the area under precision recall curve of the classification model are 0.85 and 0.6, respectively. The aggregation rates and viscosity models can be used to predict antibody stability to facilitate pharmaceutical development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.