Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075804›Full record

Observational studyCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2022

Real-world data prognostic model of overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors as second-line monotherapy.

Cristina Julian, Robson J M Machado, Sandhya Girish, Pascal Chanu, Dominik Heinzmann, Chris Harbron, Anda Gershon, Shannon M Pfeiffer, Wei Zou, Valerie Quarmby and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cristina JulianGenentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Robson J M MachadoRoche Products, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Sandhya GirishGenentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Pascal ChanuGenentech/Roche, Lyon, France.
Dominik HeinzmannF Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Chris HarbronRoche Products, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Anda GershonGenentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Shannon M PfeifferGenentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Wei ZouGenentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Valerie QuarmbyGenentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Qing ZhangGenentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Yachi ChenGenentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Roche (United Kingdom) · GBRoche (France) · FRRoche (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe objective of this retrospective, observational, noninterventional cohort study was to investigate prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) and to develop a novel prognostic model.

methodsA total of 4049 patients with aNSCLC diagnosed between January 2011 and February 2020 who received atezolizumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab as second-line monotherapy were selected from a real-world deidentified database to build the cohort. Patients could not have received first-line treatment with clinical study drug(s) nor immune checkpoint inhibitors including anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 therapies.

resultsPatients had a median age of 69 years; 45% were female, 75% White, 70% had stage IV at initial diagnosis, and 70% had nonsquamous histology. A Cox proportional hazards model with lasso regularization was used to build a prognostic model for OS using 18 baseline demographic and clinical factors based on the real-world data cohort. The risk-increasing prognostic factors were abnormally low albumin and chloride levels, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score ≥ 2, and abnormally high levels of alkaline phosphatase and white blood cells. The risk-decreasing prognostic factors were PD-L1 positivity, longer time from advanced diagnosis to start of first-line therapy, and higher systolic blood pressure. The performance of the model was validated using data from the OAK trial, and the c-index for the OAK trial validation cohort was 0.65 and 0.67 for the real-world data cohort.

conclusionsBased on baseline demographic and clinical factors from a real-world setting, this prognostic model was developed to discriminate the risk of death in patients with aNSCLC treated with checkpoint inhibitors as second-line monotherapy, and it performed well in the real-world data and clinical trial cohorts.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAgedAlbuminsAlkaline PhosphataseB7-H1 AntigenChloridesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleNivolumabPrognosisProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAlbuminsAlkaline PhosphataseAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanChloridesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNivolumabPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptoradvanced NSCLCimmune checkpoint inhibitorsprognostic modelreal-world data

Identifiers

PMID35075804
PMCPMC9575492
OpenAlexW4210694119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.