Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075756›Full record

ArticleClinical implant dentistry and related research2022

Monolithic zirconia single tooth implant-supported restorations with CAD/CAM titanium abutments in the posterior region: A 1-year prospective case series study.

Vincent J J Donker, Gerry M Raghoebar, Charlotte Jensen-Louwerse, Arjan Vissink, Henny J A Meijer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincent J J DonkerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4302-9033
Gerry M RaghoebarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-7141
Charlotte Jensen-LouwerseDepartment of Implant Dentistry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3483-5220
Arjan VissinkDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2581-4361
Henny J A MeijerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1702-6031
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcome measures, including the success of screw-retained monolithic zirconia implant-supported restorations with CAD/CAM titanium abutments in the posterior region during a 1-year follow-up.

methodsIn a prospective case series, 50 molar sites in the posterior region of 46 patients with a minimum age of 18 years and sufficient bone volume and anatomical conditions for placing an implant (≥8 mm) and an anatomical restoration were included. Parallel-walled implants with a conical connection were inserted in a two-stage surgical procedure. Implant uncovering and healing abutment placement occurred 12 weeks after insertion. Two weeks after mucosa healing, a screw-retained monolithic zirconia restoration with a CAD/CAM titanium abutment was placed. Clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcome measures were collected at baseline before implant placement and then during the 1 month and 1 year follow-ups.

resultsAt the 1 year follow-up, 49 restorations could be evaluated. The plaque accumulation, presence of calculus, bleeding tendency and peri-implant inflammation indices were low, representing healthy peri-implant conditions. The mean marginal bone level change between the 1 month and the 1 year follow-up was -0.17 ± 0.46 mm. The mean patient satisfaction was high. The restoration success was, according to the modified USPHS criteria, 95.9%.

conclusionMonolithic zirconia implant-supported restorations with CAD/CAM titanium abutments have very good clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes after 1 year in function.

Indexed as

Dental Implants, Single-ToothTitaniumAdolescentComputer-Aided DesignCrownsDental AbutmentsDental Implant-Abutment DesignDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedHumansZirconiumTitaniumZirconiumzirconium oxideabutmentCAD/CAMimplantmonolithicrestorationstitaniumzirconia

Identifiers

PMID35075756
PMCPMC9303442
OpenAlexW4207010031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.