Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075705›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2023

Exploring the therapeutic relationship through the reflective practice of nurses in acute mental health units: A qualitative study.

Diana Tolosa-Merlos, Antonio R Moreno-Poyato, Francesca González-Palau, Alonso Pérez-Toribio, Georgina Casanova-Garrigós, Pilar Delgado-Hito, MiRTCIME.CAT Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Peer support in acute psychiatric inpatient settings: A scoping review.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diana Tolosa-MerlosInstitut de Neuropsiquiatria i Addiccions, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7668-0557
Antonio R Moreno-PoyatoDepartment of Public Health, Mental Health and Maternal and Child Health Nursing, Nursing School, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5700-4315
Francesca González-PalauHospital Santa Maria, Salut/Gestió de Serveis Sanitaris, Lleida, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-9089
Alonso Pérez-ToribioUnitat de Salut Mental de l'Hospitalet, Gerència Territorial Metropolitana Sud, Institut Català de la Salut, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8962-974X
Georgina Casanova-GarrigósDepartment and Faculty of Nursing, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tortosa, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3652-9745
Pilar Delgado-HitoDepartment of Fundamental Care and Medical-Surgical Nursing, Nursing School, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7077-3648
MiRTCIME.CAT Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTo explore the therapeutic relationship through the reflective practice of nurses in acute mental health units.

backgroundIn mental health units, the therapeutic relationship is especially relevant for increasing the effectiveness of nursing interventions. Reflective practice is considered an essential aspect for improving nursing care.

designAction and observation stages of a participatory action research project.

methodsData were collected through reflective diaries designed for the guided description and reflection of practice interactions related to the therapeutic relationship and content analysis was applied. A total of 152 nurses from 18 acute mental health units participated. The COREQ guidelines were used.

resultsThe results were classified into three categories as follows: (i) Nursing attitude as a core of the therapeutic relationship. For the nurses, the attitudinal component was key in the therapeutic relationship. (ii) Nursing practices that are essential to the therapeutic relationship. Nurses identified practices such as creating a conducive environment, using an appropriate verbal approach, offering help and working together with the patient as essential for establishing a therapeutic relationship in practice. (iii) Contextual factors affecting the therapeutic relationship. The nurses considered the patient's condition, the care dynamics of the unit and its regulations, as well as the structure and environment of the unit, as contextual factors involved the establishment of an adequate therapeutic relationship in daily clinical practice.

conclusionsThis study has provided knowledge of the importance and role of the nurses' attitude in the context of the nurse-patient therapeutic relationship based on the reflections of nurses in mental health units regarding their own practice. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: These findings help nurses to increase awareness and develop improvement strategies based on their own knowledge and day-to-day difficulties. Moreover, managers can evaluate strategies that promote motivation and facilitate the involvement of nurses to improve the therapeutic relationship with patients.

Indexed as

Nursing CarePsychiatric NursingHumansMental HealthNurse-Patient RelationsQualitative Researchaction researchnarrativenurse-patient relationshipspsychiatric nursingreflective practice

Identifiers

PMID35075705
PMCPMC10078778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.