Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075580›Full record

ReviewNeurocritical care2022

Neuromonitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Maria D Karagianni, Alexandros G Brotis, Charalambos Gatos, Theodosis Kalamatianos, Charikleia Vrettou, George Stranjalis, Konstantinos N Fountas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria D KaragianniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527, Athens, Greece. mkaragianni@uth.gr.
Alexandros G BrotisDepartment of Neurosurgery, General University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, 41110, Larissa, Greece.
Charalambos GatosDepartment of Neurosurgery, General University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, 41110, Larissa, Greece.
Theodosis KalamatianosAthens Microneurosurgery Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Evangelismos Hospital, 10675, Athens, Greece.
Charikleia VrettouFirst Department of Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos Hospital, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 45-47 Ipsilantou St, 10676, Athens, Greece.
George StranjalisAthens Microneurosurgery Laboratory, Evangelismos Hospital, 10675, Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos N FountasDepartment of Neurosurgery, General University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, 41110, Larissa, Greece.
Evangelismos Hospital · GRUniversity Hospital of Larissa · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of mortality and disability among trauma-related injuries. Neuromonitoring plays an essential role in the management and prognosis of patients with severe TBI. Our bibliometric study aimed to identify the knowledge base, define the research front, and outline the social networks on neuromonitoring in severe TBI. We conducted an electronic search for articles related to neuromonitoring in severe TBI in Scopus. A descriptive analysis retrieved evidence on the most productive authors and countries, the most cited articles, the most frequently publishing journals, and the most common author's keywords. Through a three-step network extraction process, we performed a collaboration analysis among universities and countries, a cocitation analysis, and a word cooccurrence analysis. A total of 1884 records formed the basis of our bibliometric study. We recorded an increasing scientific interest in the use of neuromonitoring in severe TBI. Czosnyka, Hutchinson, Menon, Smielewski, and Stocchetti were the most productive authors. The most cited document was a review study by Maas et al. There was an extensive collaboration among universities. The most common keywords were "intracranial pressure," with an increasing interest in magnetic resonance imaging and cerebral perfusion pressure monitoring. Neuromonitoring constitutes an area of active research. The present findings indicate that intracranial pressure monitoring plays a pivotal role in the management of severe TBI. Scientific interest shifts to magnetic resonance imaging and individualized patient care on the basis of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticBibliometricsCerebrovascular CirculationHumansIntracranial PressureMonitoring, PhysiologicBibliometricsIntracranial pressureMonitoringSevere traumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID35075580
OpenAlexW4206999719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.