Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075546›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2022

Bioreduction and bioremoval of hexavalent chromium by genetically engineered strains (Escherichia coli MT2A and Escherichia coli MT3).

Şeyma Akkurt, Merve Oğuz, Aysel Alkan Uçkun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Şeyma AkkurtDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Adıyaman University, Altınşehir Neighborhood, Ataturk Boulevard, No. 1, Central Campus, 02040, Central, Adıyaman, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-1975
Merve OğuzDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8388-1477
Aysel Alkan UçkunDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Adıyaman University, Altınşehir Neighborhood, Ataturk Boulevard, No. 1, Central Campus, 02040, Central, Adıyaman, Turkey. auckun@adiyaman.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8957-7476
Adıyaman University · TRErciyes University · TR

Funding

erciyes üniversitesi FDK-2019-9543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of studies on the removal of hazardous metals from water using genetic engineering technologies is growing. A high rate of metal ion removal from the environment is ensured, particularly through the expression of cysteine and thiol-rich proteins such as metallothioneins in bacterial cells. In this study, we used recombinant strains created by cloning the human metallothioneins MT2A and MT3 into Escherichia coli Jm109 to assess the removal and reduction of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) from aqueous solutions. MT2A was the most effective strain in both Cr(VI) removal (89% in 25 mg/L Cr(VI)) and Cr(VI) reduction (76% in 25 mg/L Cr(VI)). The amount of Cr adsorbed per dry cell by the MT2A strain was 22 mg/g. The biosorption of total Cr was consistent with the Langmuir isotherm model. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images revealed that the morphological structures of Cr(VI)-treated cells were significantly damaged when compared to control cells. Scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) images showed black spots in the cytoplasm of cells treated with Cr(VI). Shifts in the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis (FTIR) spectra of the cells treated with Cr(VI) showed that the groups interacting with Cr were hydroxyl, amine, amide I, amide II, phosphoryl and carbonyl. When all of the experimental data was combined, it was determined that both MT2A and MT3 were effective in removing Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions, but MT2A was more effective, indicating that MT2A may be employed as a biotechnological tool.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalAdsorptionBiotechnologyChromiumCloning, MolecularEscherichia coliGenetic EngineeringHumansMetallothioneinMetalsWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater PurificationChromiumchromium hexavalent ionMetallothioneinMetalsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiological treatmentBioremediationChromium removalCr(VI) bioreductionGenetical engineered bacteriaMetalloproteins

Identifiers

PMID35075546
OpenAlexW4221078827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.