Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075539›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2022

Reproducibility of radiomic features in CT images of NSCLC patients: an integrative analysis on the impact of acquisition and reconstruction parameters.

Lisa Rinaldi, Simone P De Angelis, Sara Raimondi, Stefania Rizzo, Cristiana Fanciullo, Cristiano Rampinelli, Manuel Mariani, Alessandro Lascialfari, Marta Cremonesi, Roberto Orecchia and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lisa RinaldiRadiation Research Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Simone P De AngelisDepartment of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Sara RaimondiDepartment of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy. sara.raimondi@ieo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4673-9049
Stefania RizzoClinica di Radiologia EOC, Istituto Imaging della Svizzera Italiana (IIMSI), via Tesserete 46, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.
Cristiana FanciulloPostgraduate School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Cristiano RampinelliDepartment of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Manuel MarianiDepartment of Physics, Università degli Studi di Pavia and INFN, via Bassi 6, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Alessandro LascialfariDepartment of Physics, Università degli Studi di Pavia and INFN, via Bassi 6, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Marta CremonesiRadiation Research Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Roberto OrecchiaScientific Directorate, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Daniela Origgi *Medical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Francesca Botta *Medical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated to what extent tube voltage, scanner model, and reconstruction algorithm affect radiomic feature reproducibility in a single-institution retrospective database of computed tomography images of non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

methodsThis study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (UID 2412). Images of 103 patients were considered, being acquired on either among two scanners, at 100 or 120 kVp. For each patient, images were reconstructed with six iterative blending levels, and 1414 features were extracted from each reconstruction. At univariate analysis, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was applied to evaluate feature differences within scanners and voltages, whereas the impact of the reconstruction was established with the overall concordance correlation coefficient (OCCC). A multivariable mixed model was also applied to investigate the independent contribution of each acquisition/reconstruction parameter. Univariate and multivariable analyses were combined to analyse feature behaviour.

resultsScanner model and voltage did not affect features significantly. The reconstruction blending level showed a significant impact at both univariate analysis (154/1414 features yielding an OCCC < 0.85) and multivariable analysis, with most features (1042/1414) revealing a systematic trend with the blending level (multiple comparisons adjusted p < 0.05). Reproducibility increased in association to image processing with smooth filters, nonetheless specific investigation in relation to clinical endpoints should be performed to ensure that textural information is not removed.

conclusionsCombining univariate and multivariable models is allowed to identify features for which corrections may be applied to reduce the trend with the algorithm and increase reproducibility. Subsequent clustering may be applied to eliminate residual redundancy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsHumansReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCarcinoma (non-small-cell lung)Image processing (computer-assisted)Machine learningReproducibility of resultsTomography (x-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID35075539
PMCPMC8786992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.