ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022
Chief Residency Selection in Internal Medicine: Who Is Left Out?
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterogeneity in internal medicine chief residency selection processes and role preparation: an opportunity for improvement.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Intersectionality and diversity, equity, and inclusion in the healthcare and scientific workforces.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Review
- The selection of chief residents across residency programs at a large academic medical center.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Implementation of a Chief Resident Selection Process Designed to Mitigate Bias: Lessons Learned.Cureus · 2023Article
- Chief resident behaviors that lead to effective morning reports, a multisite qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Intersectionality of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender in the Otolaryngology Match From 2013 to 2019.The Laryngoscope · 2023Article
- Performance on Patient Experience Measures of Former Chief Medical Residents as Physician Exemplars Chosen by the Profession.JAMA internal medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Little progress has been made in improving racial, gender, or intersectional diversity within academic internal medicine (IM). Chief Residency fulfills a unique opportunity to target diversity efforts; Chief Residents (CR) are integral in creating an inclusive environment and support system for IM trainees, and the position serves as a steppingstone for future leadership positions within academia. However, the CR selection process often lacks transparency and includes steps that are fraught with bias, thereby disadvantaging underrepresented minority groups from gaining important experience needed to climb the academic ladder. We describe a more standardized selection process that will improve recruitment and selection of more diverse CRs and ultimately improve the recruitment, retention, and promotion of more diverse faculty within academic internal medicine. Key recommendations include an open call for applications, the use of standardized and structured interviews, and the formation of a diverse selection committee to conduct a transparent selection process based on explicitly defined criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.