Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075509›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

The importance of joint line obliquity: a radiological analysis of restricted boundaries in normal knee phenotypes to inform surgical decision making in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

Samuel J MacDessi, Richard J Allom, Will Griffiths-Jones, Darren B Chen, Jil A Wood, Johan Bellemans

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Excellent results of restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 10 years of follow-up.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Samuel J MacDessiCPAK Research Group, Suite 201, 131 Princes Highway, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, 2217, Australia. samuelmacdessi@sydneyknee.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1578-7614
Richard J AllomSydney Knee Specialists, Suite 201, 131 Princes Highway, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Will Griffiths-JonesCPAK Research Group, Suite 201, 131 Princes Highway, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Darren B ChenCPAK Research Group, Suite 201, 131 Princes Highway, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Jil A WoodSydney Knee Specialists, Suite 201, 131 Princes Highway, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Johan BellemansCPAK Research Group, Suite 201, 131 Princes Highway, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Prince of Wales Hospital · AUSydney Hernia Specialists Clinic · AUNorth Devon District Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRestricted kinematic alignment (rKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore native soft tissue laxities while limiting alignment extremes that risk prosthetic failure. However, there is no consensus where restricted boundaries (RB) should be set. This study aims to determine the proportion of limbs in which constitutional alignment and joint line obliquity (JLO) would be restored with various RB scenarios, to inform decision making in rKA TKA.

methodsThe mechanical hip-knee-ankle (mHKA) angle, arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) angle, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured on radiographs of 500 normal knees. Incrementally wider RBs were then applied. The proportion of limbs within each increment was determined when RBs were applied only to HKA, or to HKA, LDFA and MPTA together. In addition, the proportion of limbs within published adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) and rKA protocols were determined, as well as those within one, two and three standard deviations of the means for HKA, LDFA and MPTA.

resultsWhen restrictions to mHKA alone were applied, 74.0% and 97.8% of knees were captured with boundaries of ± 3° and ± 6° respectively. However, when the same boundaries to HKA were also applied to MPTA and LDFA, 36.2% and 91.0% of knees were captured respectively, highlighting the limiting effect that JLO has on restoration of normal knee phenotypes. When comparing previously published boundaries, aMA of 0° ± 3° captured 36.2%; rKA of 0° ± 3 for HKA and 85° to 95° for LDFA/MPTA captured 67.8%; rKA of - 5° to 4° HKA and 86°-93° for LDFA/MPTA captured 63%; and rKA of - 6° to + 3° for HKA and 84°-93° for LDFA/MPTA captured 85.4%.

conclusionThe greatest proportions of normal knee phenotypes were captured with boundaries that were centred around population means for HKA and JLO. Further, these findings demonstrate that restricting the JLO has a significant limiting influence on restoration of normal knee phenotypes beyond that of restricting HKA alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFractures, BoneOsteoarthritis, KneeDecision MakingHumansKnee JointPhenotypeRetrospective StudiesTibiaAdjusted mechanical alignmentConstitutional alignmentKinematic alignmentRestricted boundariesRestricted kinematic alignmentTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35075509
OpenAlexW4207013269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.