Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075496›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2022

Different modulation of oscillatory common neural drives to ankle muscles during abrupt and gradual gait adaptations.

Ryosuke Kitatani, Ayaka Maeda, Jun Umehara, Shigehito Yamada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Inducing asymmetric gait in healthy walkers: a review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Delayed cortical engagement associated with balance dysfunction after stroke.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryosuke KitataniDepartment of Physical Therapy, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398, Shimami‑cho, Kita‑ku, Niigata, 950‑3198, Japan. ryosuke-kitatani@nuhw.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6580-7946
Ayaka MaedaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Jun UmeharaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1258-0714
Shigehito YamadaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-6927
Kyoto University · JPJapan Society for the Promotion of Science · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17H06770Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19K19866Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K17455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different neural contributions to motor learning might be involved when different error sizes of perturbation are introduced. Although the corticospinal drive contributes to abrupt gait adaptation processes, no studies have investigated whether cortical involvement during gait differs between perturbations applied abruptly and gradually. This study aimed to investigate the differences in oscillatory common neural drives to ankle muscles during gait between abrupt and gradual adaptations, using coherence analyses of paired surface electromyographic (EMG) recordings. Sixteen healthy young adults performed the treadmill gait with perturbation resisting forward movement of the swing leg for 10 min under two conditions: abrupt (a large perturbation from the beginning of the adaptation period) and gradual (a series of small perturbations that gradually increased). Swing phase duration and step length showed significantly greater asymmetry in the abrupt condition than in the gradual condition in the early adaptation period (p < 0.01), despite no significant differences in gait symmetries between the two conditions in the early post-adaptation period. EMG-EMG coherence calculated from the tibialis anterior muscle in the beta band (15-35 Hz) on the perturbed side was significantly higher in the early adaptation period in the abrupt condition (p < 0.05), but not in the gradual condition. There were significant relationships between changes in temporal gait symmetry and EMG-EMG coherence during the different adaptation periods between the two conditions (p < 0.05). The abrupt large perturbation seems to require a cortical involvement, whereas a gradual adaptation with small gait asymmetry requires no modulation of cortical involvement.

Indexed as

AnkleGaitAdaptation, PhysiologicalElectromyographyHumansMuscle, SkeletalYoung AdultCoherenceCorticospinal tractLocomotor adaptationMotor learningOscillation

Identifiers

PMID35075496
OpenAlexW4207072177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.