Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075494›Full record

Trial reportUrolithiasis2022

Ningmitai capsule promotes calculi expulsion after RIRS for 10-20-mm upper urinary stones: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Ruofan Wang, Qingdong Qiao, Dengke Yang, Jianguo Zhang, Chaoyang Zhu, Jiantao Sun, Zhongling Dou, Xiaofu Wang, Huiming Zhang, Wenhao Wang and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Urolithiasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ruofan Wang *Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 2 Jingba Road, Zhengzhou, 450014, Henan, China.
Qingdong Qiao *Department of Urology, Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China.
Dengke Yang *Department of Urology, The 990th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Zhumadian, Henan, China.
Jianguo Zhang *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Chaoyang Zhu *Department of Urology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Jiantao Sun *Department of Urology, The Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Xigong District, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Zhongling DouDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Xiaofu WangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 2 Jingba Road, Zhengzhou, 450014, Henan, China.
Huiming ZhangDepartment of Urology, Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China.
Wenhao WangDepartment of Urology, The 990th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Zhumadian, Henan, China.
Fei XiaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Hepeng ChengDepartment of Urology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Wenwei LvDepartment of Urology, The Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Xigong District, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Bo ZhouInstitute of Central Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xiaofan ZhangInstitute of Central Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Wuxue LiDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 2 Jingba Road, Zhengzhou, 450014, Henan, China.
Xinghua ZhaoDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 2 Jingba Road, Zhengzhou, 450014, Henan, China.
Bin HaoDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 2 Jingba Road, Zhengzhou, 450014, Henan, China.
Changbao XuDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 2 Jingba Road, Zhengzhou, 450014, Henan, China. xcb1966@126.com.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology · CNChinese People's Liberation Army · CNHenan University Huaihe Hospital and Huaihe Clinical Institute · CNLuoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University · CNXinxiang Central Hospital · CN

Funding

medical science and technology planning project of henan province,china LHGJ20190322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of Ningmitai capsule as an adjunctive stone expulsion therapy after RIRS. All patients were diagnosed with upper urinary tract calculi measuring 10-20 mm. The patients who successfully underwent RIRS were randomly assigned to the NMT capsule group (Ningmitai capsule, 1.52 g, three times daily) or the control group for 4 weeks based on the random number table method. The primary endpoints were the stone expulsion rate (SER) and stone-free rate (SFR). The average stone expulsion time (SET), average stone-free time (SFT) and complications were recorded. Between July 2, 2019, and December 17, 2020, 220 participants successfully underwent RIRS across 6 centers; 123 of them were randomized according to the exclusion criteria, and 102 (83%) were included in the primary analysis. The SERs on the 3rd, 7th, 14th and 28th days were significantly increased in the NMT capsule group compared with the control group (78.95% vs. 31.11%, 92.98% vs. 55.56%, 94.74% vs. 64.44%, 100% vs. 82.22%, respectively, p < 0.05). The SFRs on the 3rd and 7th days were not different (p > 0.05), while those on the 14th and 28th days were higher in the NMT capsule group (63.16% vs. 24.44% and 92.98% vs. 68.89%, p < 0.05). The average SET and average SFT of the NMT capsule group were remarkably shorter than those of the control group (p < 0.001). During the follow-up period, there were no significant differences in urine RBC counts between the two groups (p > 0.05). The urine WBC counts of the NMT capsule group were significantly lower than those of the control group on the 14

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousUrinary CalculiUrinary TractHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChinese prescription expulsionNingmitai capsuleRetrograde intrarenal surgeryUpper urinary calculi

Identifiers

PMID35075494
PMCPMC8786453
OpenAlexW4206905268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.