ArticleInternational journal of information technology : an official journal of Bharati Vidyapeeth's Institute of Computer Applications and Management2022
An enforced block diagonal low-rank representation method for the classification of medical image patterns.
Article in International journal of information technology : an official journal of Bharati Vidyapeeth's Institute of Computer Applications and Management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-rank representation based methods have been used on a variety of medical imaging databases for the segmentation and classification of biomedical images. The subspace segmentation of the data is performed by generating the block diagonal coefficient matrix. Whereas, the data is classified by performing the partitioning of the low-rank representation matrix. There exist several such methods for analysing medical images. The major difference between them lies in the construction of the data dictionary. Most of the time, the input data pattern is used as the dictionary for learning the representation matrix. The direct use of the input data for learning the representation degrades the performance of the model because medical images are subjected to outliers of multiple types, which include environmental lighting, image appearance and varying illumination. These types of errors induce noise in the data. It has been observed that the representation-based model is robust when the training data is clean. If the training data contains corrupted subsamples, the performance of the model drops down. We have addressed the mentioned problem by adopting a class-wise dictionary learning approach. In which the pattern of each class is learnt as the set of tuples in the dictionary. The model has been evaluated on several medical imaging datasets, which includes the Break-his dataset, ALL-IDB, biomedical images, covid CT and chest X-ray. The classification performance of the model is best for the biomedical database (99.16%) followed by the Covid dataset (94%), ALL-IDB database (93.47%) and Break-his dataset (93%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.