Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075428›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2022

A U-Net Approach to Apical Lesion Segmentation on Panoramic Radiographs.

Ibrahim S Bayrakdar, Kaan Orhan, Özer Çelik, Elif Bilgir, Hande Sağlam, Fatma Akkoca Kaplan, Sinem Atay Görür, Alper Odabaş, Ahmet Faruk Aslan, Ingrid Różyło-Kalinowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Artificial Intelligence in Endodontics-A Bibliometric Analysis.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ibrahim S BayrakdarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir 26040, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5036-9867
Kaan OrhanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara 06560, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6768-0176
Özer ÇelikDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir 26040, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4409-3101
Elif BilgirDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir 26040, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9521-4682
Hande SağlamDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir 26040, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7792-5106
Fatma Akkoca KaplanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir 26040, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4522-656X
Sinem Atay GörürDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir 26040, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9105-3516
Alper OdabaşDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir 26040, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4361-3056
Ahmet Faruk AslanDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir 26040, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1583-6508
Ingrid Różyło-KalinowskaDepartment of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiodiagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin 20-093, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5162-1382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the paper was the assessment of the success of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm formed on a deep-convolutional neural network (D-CNN) model for the segmentation of apical lesions on dental panoramic radiographs. A total of 470 anonymized panoramic radiographs were used to progress the D-CNN AI model based on the U-Net algorithm (CranioCatch, Eskisehir, Turkey) for the segmentation of apical lesions. The radiographs were obtained from the Radiology Archive of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology of the Faculty of Dentistry of Eskisehir Osmangazi University. A U-Net implemented with PyTorch model (version 1.4.0) was used for the segmentation of apical lesions. In the test data set, the AI model segmented 63 periapical lesions on 47 panoramic radiographs. The sensitivity, precision, and F1-score for segmentation of periapical lesions at 70% IoU values were 0.92, 0.84, and 0.88, respectively. AI systems have the potential to overcome clinical problems. AI may facilitate the assessment of periapical pathology based on panoramic radiographs.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceToothAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRadiography, Panoramic

Identifiers

PMID35075428
PMCPMC8783705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.