Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075423›Full record

ReviewAnesthesiology and pain medicine2021

Supraclavicular vs. Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Nerve Blocks: Clinical, Pharmacological, and Anatomical Considerations.

Alan D Kaye, Varsha Allampalli, Paul Fisher, Aaron J Kaye, Aaron Tran, Elyse M Cornett, Farnad Imani, Amber N Edinoff, Soudabeh Djalali Motlagh, Richard D Urman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alan D KayeLouisiana State University Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2464-0187
Varsha AllampalliLouisiana State University Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7645-6344
Paul FisherLouisiana State University Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Aaron J KayeMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Charleston, SC, USA.
Aaron TranCreighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE, USA.
Elyse M CornettLouisiana State University Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7961-3931
Farnad ImaniPain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-0772
Amber N EdinoffLouisiana State University Health Science Center Shreveport, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Shreveport, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7436-6206
Soudabeh Djalali MotlaghDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care Medicine, Firoozgar University Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5498-678X
Richard D UrmanBrigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-5977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) have become standard of care for enhanced recovery pathways after surgery. For brachial plexus delivery of anesthesia, both supraclavicular (SC) and infraclavicular (IC) approaches have been shown to require less supplemental anesthesia, are performed more rapidly, have quicker onset time, and have lower rates of complications than other approaches (axillary, interscalene, etc.). Ultrasound-guidance is commonly utilized to improve outcomes, limit the need for deep sedation or general anesthesia, and reduce procedural complications. Given the SC and IC approaches are the most common approaches for brachial plexus blocks, the differences between the two have been critically evaluated in the present manuscript. Various studies have demonstrated slight favorability towards the IC approach from the standpoint of complications and safety. Two prospective RCTs found a higher incidence of complications in the SC approach - particularly Horner syndrome. The IC method appears to support a greater block distribution as well. Overall, both SC and IC brachial plexus nerve block approaches are the most effective and safe approaches, particularly under ultrasound-guidance. Given the success of the supraclavicular and infraclavicular blocks, these techniques are an important skill set for the anesthesiologist for intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.

Indexed as

Brachial PlexusInfraclavicularPeripheral Nerve BlocksRegional AnesthesiaSupraclavicularUltrasound-Guided

Identifiers

PMID35075423
PMCPMC8782193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.