Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075397›Full record

ArticleCritical care research and practice2022

Major Bleeding in Adults Undergoing Peripheral Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): Prognosis and Predictors.

Tung Phi Nguyen, Xuan Thi Phan, Tuan Huu Nguyen, Dai Quang Huynh, Linh Thanh Tran, Huy Minh Pham, Tu Ngoc Nguyen, Hieu Trung Kieu, Thao Thi Ngoc Pham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Dynamic platelet dysfunction during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a pilot study.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tung Phi NguyenDepartment of Intensive Care, Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3795-2577
Xuan Thi PhanDepartment of Intensive Care, Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0846-0688
Tuan Huu NguyenDepartment of Hematology, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3048-6796
Dai Quang HuynhDepartment of Intensive Care, Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0761-0672
Linh Thanh TranIntensive Care Unit, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5595-8855
Huy Minh PhamIntensive Care Unit, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5126-6736
Tu Ngoc NguyenDepartment of Intensive Care, Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6832-9510
Hieu Trung KieuDepartment of Intensive Care, Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4918-9839
Thao Thi Ngoc PhamDepartment of Intensive Care, Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8312-2390
Cho Ray Hospital · VNUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMajor bleeding has been a common and serious complication with poor outcomes in ECMO patients. With a novel, less-invasive cannulation approach and closer coagulation monitoring regime, the incidence of major bleeding is currently not determined yet. Our study aims to examine the incidence of major bleeding, its determinants, and association with mortality in peripheral-ECMO patients.

methodWe conducted a single-center retrospective study on adult patients undergoing peripheral-ECMO between January 2019 and January 2020 at a tertiary referral hospital. Determinants of major bleeding were defined by logistic regression analysis. Risk factors of in-hospital mortality were determined by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

resultsMajor bleeding was reported in 33/105 patients (31.4%) and was associated with higher in-hospital mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 3.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.63-7.80,

conclusionsIn summary, major bleeding still had a fairly high incidence and poor outcome in peripheral-ECMO patients. APTT > 72 seconds, fibrinogen < 2 g/L were the strongest predicting factors for major bleeding events.

Identifiers

PMID35075397
PMCPMC8783736
OpenAlexW4205669313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.