ArticleExpert systems with applications2022
Efficient and visualizable convolutional neural networks for COVID-19 classification using Chest CT.
Article in Expert systems with applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Multi-Modal Biomarkers for Immunotherapy Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: ctDNA, Microbiome, and Radiomics.Cancers · 2026Review
- Performance of AI Approaches for COVID-19 Diagnosis Using Chest CT Scans: The Impact of Architecture and Dataset.RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin · 2026Article
- EfficientNetB5-Based Deep Learning for Automated Cancer Detection in Tissue Microarray Images.Journal of Cancer · 2026Article
- Concatenated CNN-Based Pneumonia Detection Using a Fuzzy-Enhanced Dataset.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Systematic Review on Deep Structured Learning for COVID-19 Screening Using Chest CT from 2020 to 2022.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Predicting the Severity of COVID-19 from Lung CT Images Using Novel Deep Learning.Journal of medical and biological engineering · 2023Article
- Swin-textural: A novel textural features-based image classification model for COVID-19 detection on chest computed tomography.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2023Article
- Grayscale Image Statistical Attributes Effectively Distinguish the Severity of Lung Abnormalities in CT Scan Slices of COVID-19 Patients.SN computer science · 2023Article
- Diagnosis of COVID-19 with simultaneous accurate prediction of cardiac abnormalities from chest computed tomographic images.PloS one · 2023Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in radiology and nuclear medicine: a literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- DDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- COVID-19 contagion forecasting framework based on curve decomposition and evolutionary artificial neural networks: A case study in Andalusia, Spain.Expert systems with applications · 2022Article
- Comprehensive Survey of Machine Learning Systems for COVID-19 Detection.Journal of imaging · 2022Review
- Deep feature fusion classification network (DFFCNet): Towards accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 using chest X-rays images.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2022Article
- DAFLNet: Dual Asymmetric Feature Learning Network for COVID-19 Disease Diagnosis in X-Rays.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Diagnosing Covid-19 chest x-rays with a lightweight truncated DenseNet with partial layer freezing and feature fusion.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases rising rapidly, deep learning has emerged as a promising diagnosis technique. However, identifying the most accurate models to characterize COVID-19 patients is challenging because comparing results obtained with different types of data and acquisition processes is non-trivial. In this paper we designed, evaluated, and compared the performance of 20 convolutional neutral networks in classifying patients as COVID-19 positive, healthy, or suffering from other pulmonary lung infections based on chest computed tomography (CT) scans, serving as the first to consider the EfficientNet family for COVID-19 diagnosis and employ intermediate activation maps for visualizing model performance. All models are trained and evaluated in Python using 4173 chest CT images from the dataset entitled "A COVID multiclass dataset of CT scans," with 2168, 758, and 1247 images of patients that are COVID-19 positive, healthy, or suffering from other pulmonary infections, respectively. EfficientNet-B5 was identified as the best model with an F1 score of 0.9769 ± 0.0046, accuracy of 0.9759 ± 0.0048, sensitivity of 0.9788 ± 0.0055, specificity of 0.9730 ± 0.0057, and precision of 0.9751 ± 0.0051. On an alternate 2-class dataset, EfficientNetB5 obtained an accuracy of 0.9845 ± 0.0109, F1 score of 0.9599 ± 0.0251, sensitivity of 0.9682 ± 0.0099, specificity of 0.9883 ± 0.0150, and precision of 0.9526 ± 0.0523. Intermediate activation maps and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mappings offered human-interpretable evidence of the model's perception of ground-class opacities and consolidations, hinting towards a promising use-case of artificial intelligence-assisted radiology tools. With a prediction speed of under 0.1 s on GPUs and 0.5 s on CPUs, our proposed model offers a rapid, scalable, and accurate diagnostic for COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.