Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075320›Full record

ArticleBuilding and environment2022

Respiratory pandemic and indoor aeraulics of classrooms.

P Carlotti, B Massoulié, A Morez, A Villaret, L Jing, T Vrignaud, A Pfister

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Building and environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P CarlottiArtelia, 47 avenue de Lugo, 94600 Choisy le Roi, France.
B MassouliéEcole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France.
A MorezEcole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France.
A VillaretEcole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France.
L JingEcole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France.
T VrignaudEcole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France.
A PfisterArtelia, 47 avenue de Lugo, 94600 Choisy le Roi, France.
École Polytechnique · FRArtelia (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory pandemics, such as COVID19, may be transmitted by several modes. The present work focuses on the transmission through small droplets released by people from their mouth by breathing, speaking, coughing, sneering, and possibly aspirated by other people around through their respiration. An analysis of droplet evolution in simplified situations shows that the droplets reach very quickly a quasi-equilibrium temperature before encompassing an isothermal evaporation process. The removal of droplets from suspension is thus piloted by balance between evaporation and sedimentation. It is shown that ambient relative humidity is a major factor influencing the lifetime of droplets and the distance they may travel. As a consequence, and independently of any other health consideration linked to ambient humidity, it is seen that a dry air is a favourable factor for limiting risk of contamination from COVID19. Further investigation is made using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in a classroom geometry. Several ventilation strategies are investigated: classical regulatory mechanical ventilation, open window natural ventilation and displacement natural ventilation. Ventilation has several effects which influence contamination risk: by introducing fresh air, it reduces droplet concentration; humidity released by human occupants is also limited. However, these effects are not uniform in space, and depend on ventilation strategy. Application of a dose-effect model calibrated for COVID19 to CFD results allows to estimate contamination risk. It is shown that contamination risk is higher for regulatory mechanical ventilation, and may be reduced, using natural ventilation in the absence of wind, by a factor 2.3 to nearly 3 when the teacher is sick, and by a factor 6 to 500 when a student is sick. In the presence of wind, the reduction factor is as high as 13 when the teacher is sick and 17 when a student is sick.

Indexed as

AeraulicsClassroomCOVID19Dose–effectIndoor Air QualityVLESWells model

Identifiers

PMID35075320
PMCPMC8769563
OpenAlexW4205851172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.