Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075168›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Deep learning increases the availability of organism photographs taken by citizens in citizen science programs.

Yukari Suzuki-Ohno, Thomas Westfechtel, Jun Yokoyama, Kazunori Ohno, Tohru Nakashizuka, Masakado Kawata, Takayuki Okatani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yukari Suzuki-Ohno *Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, 6-3 Aoba, Aramaki-aza, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8578, Japan. yukari.tohoku.univ@gmail.com.
Thomas Westfechtel *Department of System Information Sciences, Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, 6-6-01 Aoba, Aramaki-aza, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8579, Japan. thomas.westfechtel@gmail.com.
Jun YokoyamaFaculty of Science, Yamagata University, 1-4-12 Kojirakawa, Yamagata, Yamagata, 990-8560, Japan.
Kazunori OhnoNew Industry Creation Hatchery Center, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aoba, Aramaki-aza, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0845, Japan.
Tohru NakashizukaResearch Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kamigamo-Motoyama 457-4, Kita-ku, Kyoto, 603-8047, Japan.
Masakado KawataGraduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, 6-3 Aoba, Aramaki-aza, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8578, Japan.
Takayuki OkataniDepartment of System Information Sciences, Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, 6-6-01 Aoba, Aramaki-aza, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8579, Japan.

Funding

Environment Research and Technology Development Fund S-15 Predicting and Assessing Natural Capital and Ecosystem ServicesGrant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellow JP16J40194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citizen science programs using organism photographs have become popular, but there are two problems related to photographs. One problem is the low quality of photographs. It is laborious to identify species in photographs taken outdoors because they are out of focus, partially invisible, or under different lighting conditions. The other is difficulty for non-experts to identify species. Organisms usually have interspecific similarity and intraspecific variation, which hinder species identification by non-experts. Deep learning solves these problems and increases the availability of organism photographs. We trained a deep convolutional neural network, Xception, to identify bee species using various quality of bee photographs that were taken by citizens. These bees belonged to two honey bee species and 10 bumble bee species with interspecific similarity and intraspecific variation. We investigated the accuracy of species identification by biologists and deep learning. The accuracy of species identification by Xception (83.4%) was much higher than that of biologists (53.7%). When we grouped bee photographs by different colors resulting from intraspecific variation in addition to species, the accuracy of species identification by Xception increased to 84.7%. The collaboration with deep learning and experts will increase the reliability of species identification and their use for scientific researches.

Indexed as

Animal Identification SystemsCitizen ScienceDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAnimalsBeesPhotography

Identifiers

PMID35075168
PMCPMC8786926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.