Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35075144›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Shifts in the foraging tactics of crocodiles following invasion by toxic prey.

Abhilasha Aiyer, Richard Shine, Ruchira Somaweera, Tina Bell, Georgia Ward-Fear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abhilasha AiyerSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Richard ShineSchool of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Ruchira SomaweeraSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Tina BellSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Georgia Ward-FearSchool of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia. georgia.ward-fear@mq.edu.au.

Funding

Australian Research Council LP170100013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasions can modify the behaviour of vulnerable native species in subtle ways. For example, native predators may learn or evolve to reduce foraging in conditions (habitats, times of day) that expose them to a toxic invasive species. In tropical Australia, freshwater crocodiles (Crocodylus johnstoni) are often fatally poisoned when they ingest invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina). The risk may be greatest if toads are seized on land, where a predator cannot wash away the toxins before they are absorbed into its bloodstream. Hence, toad invasion might induce crocodiles to forage in aquatic habitats only, foregoing terrestrial hunting. To test this idea, we conducted standardised trials of bait presentation to free-ranging crocodiles in sites with and without invasive toads. As anticipated, crocodiles rapidly learned to avoid consuming toads, and shifted to almost exclusively aquatic foraging.

Indexed as

Alligators and CrocodilesFeeding BehaviorIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsAnuraWestern Australia

Identifiers

PMID35075144
PMCPMC8786828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.