Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35074933›Full record

ArticleLupus science & medicine2022

Immune gene expression and functional networks in distinct lupus nephritis classes.

Alyssa C Gilmore, Hannah R Wilson, Thomas D Cairns, Marina Botto, Liz Lightstone, Ian N Bruce, Herbert Terence Cook, Matthew Caleb Pickering, MASTERPLANS Consortium

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alyssa C GilmoreDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Hannah R WilsonDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Thomas D CairnsImperial Lupus Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Marina BottoDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Liz LightstoneDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ian N BruceCentre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3047-500X
Herbert Terence CookDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Matthew Caleb PickeringDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK matthew.pickering@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1153-0192
MASTERPLANS Consortium
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial College London · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M01665X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the utility of the NanoString platform in elucidating kidney immune transcripts for class III, IV and V lupus nephritis (LN) using a retrospective cohort of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) kidney biopsy tissue.

methodsImmune gene transcript analysis was performed using the NanoString nCounter platform on RNA from LN (n=55), thin basement membrane (TBM) disease (n=14) and membranous nephropathy (MN) (n=9) FFPE kidney biopsy tissue. LN samples consisted of single class III (n=11), IV (n=23) and V (n=21) biopsies with no mixed lesions. Differential gene expression was performed with NanoString nSolver, with visualisations of volcano plots and heatmaps generated in R. Significant transcripts were interrogated to identify functional networks using STRING and Gene ontogeny terms.

resultsIn comparison to TBM, we identified 52 significantly differentially expressed genes common to all three LN classes. Pathway analysis showed enrichment for type I interferon (IFN) signalling, complement and MHC II pathways, with most showing the highest expression in class IV LN. Our class IV LN biopsies also showed significant upregulation of NF-κB signalling and immunological enrichment in comparison to class V LN biopsies. Transcripts from the type I IFN pathway distinguished class V LN from MN.

conclusionOur whole kidney section transcriptomic analysis provided insights into the molecular profile of class III, IV and V LN. The data highlighted important pathways common to all three classes and pathways enriched in our class IV LN biopsies. The ability to reveal molecular pathways in LN using FFPE whole biopsy sections could have clinical utility in treatment selection for LN.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicLupus NephritisGene ExpressionHumansKidneyRetrospective Studiesinflammationlupus erythematosuslupus nephritissystemic

Identifiers

PMID35074933
PMCPMC8788334
OpenAlexW4206993701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.