Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35074904›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

Improved prognosis and evidence of enhanced immunogenicity in tumor and circulation of high-risk melanoma patients with unknown primary.

Ahmad A Tarhini, Sandra J Lee, Aik-Choon Tan, Issam M El Naqa, F Stephen Hodi, Lisa H Butterfield, William A LaFramboise, Walter J Storkus, Arivarasan D Karunamurthy, Jose R Conejo-Garcia and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmad A TarhiniCutaneous Oncology, Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA ahmad.tarhini@moffitt.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3193-9702
Sandra J LeeBiostatistics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Aik-Choon TanBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Issam M El NaqaMachine Learning, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
F Stephen HodiDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lisa H ButterfieldThe Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3439-9844
William A LaFramboisePathology and Laboratory Medicine, Allegheny Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Walter J StorkusImmunology, Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8961-4444
Arivarasan D KarunamurthyUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jose R Conejo-GarciaImmunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Patrick HwuAdministration, Cutaneous Oncology, Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Howard StreicherCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Vernon K SondakCutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
John M KirkwoodUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USAllegheny Health Network · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
ECOG-ACRIN Biospecimen Bank to Support NCTNU24CA196172 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON, Scott D Jewell · 2015 to 2026
$41.1M
NCIC Clinical Trials Group - Canadian Collaborating Clinical Trials NetworkU10CA180863 · NCI · QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON · PI Janet Ellen Dancey · 2014 to 2026
$40.4M
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center NCTN Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233234 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Aaron Thomas Gerds, Daniel Eidelberg Spratt · 2019 to 2026
$11.1M
Montefiore Academic Community NCORP ProgramUG1CA189859 · NCI · MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER (BRONX, NY) · PI Balazs Halmos, Della Makower · 2014 to 2026
$10.8M
OSU as a Network Lead Academic Participating Site for the NCI NCTNUG1CA233331 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI John L. Hays, Dwight H. Owen · 2019 to 2026
$8.9M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareUG1CA233180 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Harold John Burstein · 2019 to 2026
$8.6M
NCI NCTN-Network Lead Academic Participating Site at UPMC Hillman Cancer CenterUG1CA233184 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ADAM M BRUFSKY, John Munn Kirkwood · 2019 to 2026
$7.7M
Vascular Leukocytes Influence the Tumor MicroenvironmentR01CA124515 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Jose R Conejo-Garcia · 2007 to 2026
$7.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124515NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204419NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180863NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196172NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189859NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233163NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233180NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233184NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233196NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233234NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233270NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233320NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233331NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233337NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelanoma of unknown primary (MUP) represents a poorly understood group of patients both clinically and immunologically. We investigated differences in prognosis and candidate immune biomarkers in patients with unknown compared with those with known primary melanoma enrolled in the E1609 adjuvant trial that tested ipilimumab at 3 and 10 mg/kg vs high-dose interferon-alfa (HDI). PATIENTS AND

methodsMUP status was defined as initial presentation with cutaneous, nodal or distant metastasis without a known primary. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Stratified (by stage) log-rank test was used to compare RFS and OS by primary tumor status. Gene expression profiling (GEP) was performed on the tumor biopsies of a subset of patients. Similarly, peripheral blood samples were tested for candidate soluble and cellular immune biomarkers.

resultsMUP cases represented 12.8% of the total population (N=1699) including 11.7% on the ipilimumab arms and 14.7% on the HDI arm. Stratifying by stage, RFS (p=0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.009) showed outcomes significantly better for patients with unknown primary. The primary tumor status remained prognostically significant after adjusting for treatment and stage in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Including only ipilimumab-treated patients, RFS (p=0.005) and OS (p=0.023) were significantly better in favor of those with unknown primary. Among patients with GEP data (n=718; 102 MUP, 616 known), GEP identified pathways and genes related to autoimmunity, inflammation, immune cell infiltration and immune activation that were significantly enriched in the MUP tumors compared with known primaries. Further investigation into infiltrating immune cell types estimated significant enrichment with CD8 +and CD4+T cells, B cells and NK cells as well as significantly higher major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-I and MHC-II scores in MUP compared with known primary. Among patients tested for circulating biomarkers (n=321; 66 unknown and 255 known), patients with MUP had significantly higher circulating levels of IL-2R (p=0.04).

conclusionPatients with MUP and high-risk melanoma had significantly better prognosis and evidence of significantly enhanced immune activation within the TME and the circulation, supporting the designation of MUP as a distinct prognostic marker in patients with high-risk melanoma.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildGene Expression ProfilingHumansMelanomaNeoplasms, Unknown PrimarySkin NeoplasmsYoung Adultmelanoma

Identifiers

PMID35074904
PMCPMC8788316
OpenAlexW4207039879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.