Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35074887›Full record

Trial reportOccupational and environmental medicine2022

Randomised control trial of a proactive intervention supporting recovery in relation to stress and irregular work hours: effects on sleep, burn-out, fatigue and somatic symptoms.

Anna Dahlgren, Philip Tucker, Majken Epstein, Petter Gustavsson, Marie Söderström

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04246736 nacompletednot on this map

Bädda för Kvalitet: Proaktiva Strategier för återhämtning i främjandet av hälsa Och Arbetsprestation.

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2017 to 2018Enrolled207ConditionsSleep, Occupational Stress, Fatigue, Behavior, HealthArmsBädda för Kvalitet
NCT06678347 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Leadership for Recovery: Effects of an Intervention Programme for First-line Healthcare Managers on Employees' Recovery

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2024 to 2025Enrolled960ConditionsRecovery, Psychological, Sleep, Burnout, Work Related StressArmsLeadership for recovery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna DahlgrenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden anna.dahlgren@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-8252-3961
Philip TuckerDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8105-0901
Majken EpsteinLiljeholmens akademiska vårdcentral/Academic Primary Healthcare Center Liljeholmen, Stockholm, Sweden.
Petter GustavssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marie SöderströmDepartment of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEStockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine if a proactive recovery intervention for newly graduated registered nurses (RNs) could prevent the development of sleep problems, burn-out, fatigue or somatic symptoms.

methodsThe study was a randomised control trial with parallel design. Newly graduated RNs with less than 12 months' work experience were eligible to participate. 461 RNs from 8 hospitals in Sweden were invited, of which 207 signed up. These were randomised to either intervention or control groups. After adjustments, 99 RNs were included in the intervention group (mean age 27.5 years, 84.7% women) and 108 in the control group (mean age 27.0 years, 90.7% women). 82 RNs in the intervention group attended a group-administered recovery programme, involving three group sessions with 2 weeks between each session, focusing on proactive strategies for sleep and recovery in relation to work stress and shift work. Effects on sleep, burn-out, fatigue and somatic symptoms were measured by questionnaires at baseline, postintervention and at 6 months follow-up.

resultsPreventive effect was seen on somatic symptoms for the intervention group. Also, the intervention group showed less burn-out and fatigue symptoms at postintervention. However, these latter effects did not persist at follow-up. Participants used many of the strategies from the programme.

conclusionsA proactive, group-administered recovery programme could be helpful in strengthening recovery and preventing negative health consequences for newly graduated RNs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04246736.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalMedically Unexplained SymptomsAdultFatigueFemaleHumansMaleSleepSurveys and Questionnairesburnoutfatigueoccupational healthpreventive medicinepsychologicalsleep

Identifiers

PMID35074887
PMCPMC9209685
OpenAlexW4210261595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.