Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35074871›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

EchidnaCSI: Engaging the public in research and conservation of the short-beaked echidna.

Tahlia Perry, Alan Stenhouse, Isabella Wilson, Imma Perfetto, Michael W McKelvey, Michelle Coulson, Rachel A Ankeny, Peggy D Rismiller, Frank Grützner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Incorporating citizen science into IUCN Red List assessments.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The contribution ofParasitology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tahlia PerryThe Environment Institute, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; tahlia.perry@adelaide.edu.au frank.grutzner@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1592-5343
Alan StenhouseThe Environment Institute, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9727-4232
Isabella WilsonThe Environment Institute, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0921-995X
Imma PerfettoThe Environment Institute, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4034-9429
Michael W McKelveyPelican Lagoon Research and Wildlife Centre, Penneshaw, SA 5222, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9718-6141
Michelle CoulsonThe Environment Institute, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7014-9113
Rachel A AnkenyPublic Engagement in Science and Technology Adelaide Research Cluster, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1547-6031
Peggy D RismillerThe Environment Institute, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8730-4108
Frank GrütznerThe Environment Institute, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; tahlia.perry@adelaide.edu.au frank.grutzner@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3088-7314
The University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The short-beaked echidna is an iconic Australian animal and the most-widespread native mammal, inhabiting diverse environments. The cryptic nature of echidnas has limited research into their ecology in most areas; however, from the well-researched and endangered Kangaroo Island echidna population, we understand that the threats include habitat loss, roads, and invasive species. To obtain more information about echidnas Australia-wide, we established the Echidna Conservation Science Initiative (EchidnaCSI) citizen science project. EchidnaCSI calls on members of the public to submit photographs of wild echidnas and learn to identify and collect echidna scats for molecular analysis. To facilitate participation, we developed a smartphone application as well as ongoing social and traditional media activities and community events. In 3 y, more than 9,000 members of the public have downloaded the EchidnaCSI app, collecting 400 scats and submitting over 8,000 sightings of echidnas from across Australia. A subset of submitted scat samples were subjected to DNA extraction and PCR, which validated the approach of using citizen science for scat collection and viability for molecular analysis. To assess the impact of the project through public participation, we surveyed our participants (

Indexed as

AnimalsAustraliaEcosystemTachyglossidaeAustraliacitizen scienceDNAmonotremescat

Identifiers

PMID35074871
PMCPMC8812570
OpenAlexW4206906689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.