Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35074825›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Medication optimisation in severe mental illness (MEDIATE): protocol for a realist review.

Ian Maidment, Geoff Wong, Claire Duddy, Rachel Upthegrove, Sherifat Oduola, Katherine Allen, Simon Jacklin, Jo Howe, Maura MacPhee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Ian MaidmentCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK i.maidment@aston.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4152-9704
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Claire DuddyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7083-6589
Rachel UpthegroveDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Psychology and College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sherifat OduolaHealth Service Population Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Katherine AllenBirmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Simon JacklinSchool of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Jo HoweCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Maura MacPheeSchool of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Aston University · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBBirmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBKeele University · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSevere mental illness (SMI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. People living with SMI often receive complex medication regimens. Optimising these regimens can be challenging. Non-adherence is common and addressing it requires a collaborative approach to decision making. MEDIATE uses a realist approach with extensive engagement with experts-by-experience to make sense of the complexities and identify potential solutions.Realist research is used to unpack and explain complexity using programme theory/theories that contain causal explanations of outcomes, expressed as context-mechanism-outcome-configurations. The programme theory/theories will enable MEDIATE to address its aim of understanding what works, for whom, in what circumstances, to optimise medication use with people living with SMI. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: MEDIATE will be conducted over six stages. In stage 1, we will collaborate with our service user/family carer lived experience group (LEG) and practitioner stakeholder group (SG), to determine the focus. In stage 2, we will develop initial programme theories for what needs to be done, by whom, how and why, and in what contexts to optimise medication use. In stage 3, we will develop and run searches to identify secondary data to refine our initial programme theories.Stage 4 involves selection and appraisal: documents will be screened by title, abstract/keywords and full text against inclusion and exclusion criteria. In stage 5, relevant data will extracted, recorded and coded. Data will be analysed using a realist logic with input from the LEG and SG. Finally, in stage 6, refined programme theories will be developed, identifying causal explanations for key outcomes and the strategies required to change contexts to trigger the key mechanisms that produce these outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Primary data will not be collected, and therefore, ethical approval is not required. MEDIATE will be disseminated via publications, conferences and form the basis for future grant applications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021280980.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareMental DisordersCaregiversHumansReview Literature as Topicadult psychiatryqualitative researchtherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID35074825
PMCPMC8788310
OpenAlexW4207032975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.