Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35074823›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Night shift work, chemical coexposures and risk of female breast cancer in the Norwegian Offshore Petroleum Workers (NOPW) cohort: a prospectively recruited case-cohort study.

Fei Chih Liu, Marit Bragelien Veierød, Kristina Kjærheim, Trude Eid Robsahm, Reza Ghiasvand, H Dean Hosgood, Sven Ove Samuelsen, Magne Bråtveit, Jorunn Kirkeleit, Nathaniel Rothman and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Fei Chih LiuDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3361-3394
Marit Bragelien VeierødDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Oslo Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway.
Kristina KjærheimDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Trude Eid RobsahmDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Reza GhiasvandDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
H Dean HosgoodDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Sven Ove SamuelsenDepartment of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Magne BråtveitDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Universitetet i Bergen Det medisinsk-odontologiske fakultet, Bergen, Norway.
Jorunn KirkeleitDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Universitetet i Bergen Det medisinsk-odontologiske fakultet, Bergen, Norway.
Nathaniel RothmanOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Qing LanOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Debra T SilvermanOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Melissa C FriesenOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Ronnie BabigumiraDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Nita ShalaDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Tom K GrimsrudDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Jo Steinson StenehjemDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway jo.stenehjem@kreftregisteret.no.ORCID 0000-0002-1964-5410
Cancer Registry of Norway · NONational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examined the association between night shift work and risk of breast cancer, overall and by hormone receptor subtype, among females in the Norwegian Offshore Petroleum Workers (NOPW) cohort. We also examined the association of coexposure (chlorinated degreasers and benzene) and breast cancer risk, and possible interaction with work schedule.

designProspectively recruited case-cohort study within the NOPW cohort.

settingFemale offshore petroleum workers active on the Norwegian continental shelf.

participants600 female workers (86 cases and 514 non-cases) were included in the study. We excluded workers that died or emigrated before start of follow-up, had missing work history, were diagnosed with breast cancer or other prior malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer) before start of follow-up.

resultsNo overall association was found between breast cancer risk and work schedule (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.46 for work schedule involving night shift vs day shift only). There was no significant association between work schedule and risk of any breast cancer subtype. No significant interactions were found between work schedule and chemical coexposures (breast cancer overall P

conclusionsOur results did not provide supporting evidence that work schedule involving night shift affects breast cancer risk in female offshore petroleum workers, but should be considered cautiously due to few cases. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOccupational DiseasesPetroleumShift Work ScheduleCohort StudiesFemaleHumansRisk FactorsWork Schedule TolerancePetroleumbreast tumoursepidemiologyoccupational & industrial medicine

Identifiers

PMID35074823
PMCPMC8788313
OpenAlexW4207024588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.