Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35074764›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Impact of Team-Based Care on Emergency Department Use.

Tara Kiran, Rahim Moineddin, Alexander Kopp, Richard H Glazier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Public experiences and perspectives of primary care in Canada: results from a cross-sectional survey.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  17. Primary care services and emergency department visits in blended fee-for-service and blended capitation models: evidence from Ontario, Canada.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tara KiranDepartment of Family and Community Medicine and the MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rahim MoineddinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alexander KoppICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Richard H GlazierDepartment of Family and Community Medicine and the MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe sought to assess the impact of team-based care on emergency department (ED) use in the context of physicians transitioning from fee-for-service payment to capitation payment in Ontario, Canada.

methodsWe conducted an interrupted time series analysis to assess annual ED visit rates before and after transition from an enhanced fee-for-service model to either a team capitation model or a nonteam capitation model. We included Ontario residents aged 19 years and older who had at least 3 years of outcome data both pretransition and post-transition (N = 2,524,124). We adjusted for age, sex, income quintile, immigration status, comorbidity, and morbidity, and we stratified by rurality. A sensitivity analysis compared outcomes for team vs nonteam patients matched on year of transition, age, sex, rurality, and health region.

resultsWe compared 387,607 team and 1,399,103 nonteam patients in big cities, 213,394 team and 380,009 nonteam patients in small towns, and 65,289 team and 78,722 nonteam patients in rural areas. In big cities, after adjustment, the ED visit rate increased by 2.4% (95% CI, 2.2% to 2.6%) per year for team patients and 5.2% (95% CI, 5.1% to 5.3%) per year for nonteam patients in the years after transition (

conclusionsAdoption of team-based primary care may reduce ED use. Further research is needed to understand optimal team composition and roles.

Indexed as

PhysiciansPrimary Health CareAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFee-for-Service PlansHumansOntarioYoung Adultcapitation feeemergency department usehealthcare financinghealth care reformhealth policyinterdisciplinary health teampatient-centered carephysician payment modelspractice-based researchprimary careprimary care practice modelsteam-based careutilization

Identifiers

PMID35074764
PMCPMC8786428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.